1938
DOI: 10.2307/2980653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Indices and Clinical Assessments of the Nutrition of Schoolchildren

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1938
1938
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies attributable to the observer have been demonstrated in many branches of medicine-for example, in taking histories of patients (Cochrane et alii, 1951), in eliciting physical signs in emphysema (Fletcher, 1952), in detecting cyanosis (Comroe and Botelho, 1947), in assessing the nutritional state of children (Jones, 1938), in the interpretation of bronchoscopic findings (Houghton and Joules, 1953), in the opinions given on microscopic sections (Cole, 1936), and even in the counting of red cells (Biggs and MacMillan, 1948). But the activity which has attracted most attention in this regard is the reading of chest radiographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies attributable to the observer have been demonstrated in many branches of medicine-for example, in taking histories of patients (Cochrane et alii, 1951), in eliciting physical signs in emphysema (Fletcher, 1952), in detecting cyanosis (Comroe and Botelho, 1947), in assessing the nutritional state of children (Jones, 1938), in the interpretation of bronchoscopic findings (Houghton and Joules, 1953), in the opinions given on microscopic sections (Cole, 1936), and even in the counting of red cells (Biggs and MacMillan, 1948). But the activity which has attracted most attention in this regard is the reading of chest radiographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any extension of the number of categories beyond this is regarded, in our experience, with misgiving." In such a case, and in most cases of personality, or clinical (Jones, 1938), assessment, the rater has only a general idea of the numerical value of the measure behind the attribute and the correlation with any criterion is very low. And for cases of low correlation, Table 2 indicates that it is appropriate to use only a few categories in our rating scale.…”
Section: Categories In Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%