2005
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical health, depression and cognitive function as correlates of disability in an older Korean population

Abstract: Level of disability, as measured by the WHODAS II, was principally associated with physical health, depression and cognitive function, rather than socio-demographic factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong relation between mental health and WHODAS disability scores has been demonstrated in a variety of countries, among which the United States [23], European countries [7] and Korea [24]. We hypothesized that, due to a lower threshold in reporting symptoms, in immigrant groups depressive symptoms are associated with less disability than in native Dutch subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A strong relation between mental health and WHODAS disability scores has been demonstrated in a variety of countries, among which the United States [23], European countries [7] and Korea [24]. We hypothesized that, due to a lower threshold in reporting symptoms, in immigrant groups depressive symptoms are associated with less disability than in native Dutch subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Disability was measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) (Kim et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of this increased survival rate, however, is that an increasing number of There is a growing number of studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the WHODAS-II (Chwastiak and Von Korff, 2003;Chisolm et al, 2005;Annicchiarico et al, 2004;Kim et al, 2005;Chopra et al, 2004;Gallagher and Mulvany, 2004;McKibbin et al, 2004;Van Tubergen et al, 2003), suggesting acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and responsiveness to change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%