2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical habitat simulation for a fish community using the ANFIS method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, developed model was able to consider effect of unknown factors to predict habitat suitability. Based on review on previous researches, they were not as robust as developed IWO-ANFIS model [26,27]. In other words, application of evolutionary algorithm could improve results of habitat model or enhance proximity between results by model and observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, developed model was able to consider effect of unknown factors to predict habitat suitability. Based on review on previous researches, they were not as robust as developed IWO-ANFIS model [26,27]. In other words, application of evolutionary algorithm could improve results of habitat model or enhance proximity between results by model and observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, using simple mathematical relationship would not be precise method to assess habitats. ANFIS has been utilized to develop physical habitat data-driven models [26][27][28]. However, effectiveness of improving training methods is ambiguous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically learning the inflow time-series using a probabilistic forecast method (Liu et al, 2018) or using a reinforcement learning method (Castelletti et al, 2010) is an option to customize the presented model. The presented model can work as an upstream boundary condition of the eco-hydraulic model (Im et al, 2018). We must pay attention to multiple local optima (Wu et al, 2018) in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of monitoring points were 4,409. In the present study, the Mahalanobis distance method was used to identify outliers in the monitoring data (Im, Choi, & Choi, ). The data quality assessment identified 238 outliers, resulting in a total of 4,171 datasets for training of the ANFIS model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%