1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1976.tb14761.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical growth from birth to 16 years and longitudinal outcome of the study during the same age period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard deviation scores (SDS) for height were calculated, using a Swedish reference according to the formula (actual heightÀmean height for age and sex)/ standard deviation of height for age and sex. 18 The sitting height to standing height ratio SDS was calculated using the reference of Gerver et al 19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard deviation scores (SDS) for height were calculated, using a Swedish reference according to the formula (actual heightÀmean height for age and sex)/ standard deviation of height for age and sex. 18 The sitting height to standing height ratio SDS was calculated using the reference of Gerver et al 19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of height for age and sex. 18 Body mass index was calculated as body mass in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared (kg/m 2 ). Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA, Lunar Radiation, Madison, WI, USA) was used to measure body fat mass and areal BMD of the total body, lumbar spine, total hip (left side reported here), and femoral neck (left side reported here).…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean mid-arm muscle area of our healthy control subjects was 130% of the reference standard (Figure 2), which suggests that that particular reference may no longer be valid. For lack of more current population-based anthropometric data we used 25 y old North-American (Frisancho, 1974) and Scandinavian (Karlberg et al, 1976) references. The anthropometric`normal limits' may have changed during this time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthropometric measurements are presented as means of the percentages of the age-speci®c standards with 95% con®dence intervals (Sorva et al, 1984;Frisancho, 1974;Karlberg et al, 1976). With both the anthropometric and ultrasonographic measurements the paired Student's t-test was used to compare the mean values for the patients and the controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%