2014
DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s55828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical functioning after occupational rehabilitation and returning to work among employees with chronic musculoskeletal pain and comorbid depressive symptoms

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of this investigation was to assess whether measures of physical functioning after multidisciplinary rehabilitation are associated with return to work among individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions and comorbid depressive symptoms.MethodsIncluded were 92 employees with chronic musculoskeletal disorders who had participated in a 57- week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Their ages ranged from 25–59 years. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with those of others (15,35). A recent study from norway (36) pointed out that factors other than physical functioning could influence return to work among employees with chronic musculoskeletal pain and comorbid depressive symptoms. this is also in line with the findings of Theorell's group, that employees without a history of sickness, in comparison with employees with a history of sickness, experienced less sleep disturbances and less neck, shoulder and back pain (37).…”
Section: S2 % (N)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings are in line with those of others (15,35). A recent study from norway (36) pointed out that factors other than physical functioning could influence return to work among employees with chronic musculoskeletal pain and comorbid depressive symptoms. this is also in line with the findings of Theorell's group, that employees without a history of sickness, in comparison with employees with a history of sickness, experienced less sleep disturbances and less neck, shoulder and back pain (37).…”
Section: S2 % (N)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thirty-one studies (34%) were part of a registered clinical trial. There was no control condition in n = 42 (46%) of the studies (Angst et al, 2014 ; Asih et al, 2018 ; Beemster et al, 2020 ; Bergstrom et al, 2010 ; Burton et al, 2016 ; Caby et al, 2016 ; Hardison & Roll, 2017 ; Harris et al, 2017 ; Hartzell et al, 2014 ; Ibrahim et al, 2019 ; Johansen et al, 2019 ; Lebon et al, 2017 ; Lindholdt et al, 2017 ; Luthi et al, 2018 ; Mayer et al, 2013 ; McCubbin et al, 2014 ; Mochari-Greenberger et al, 2020 ; Pato et al, 2010 ; Poulain et al, 2010 ; Reme et al, 2016 ; Stein & Miclescu, 2013 ; Vindholmen et al, 2016 ; Calner et al, 2017 ; Ernsten & Lillefjell, 2014 ; Gismervik et al, 2020 ; Hara, Bjørngaard, Jacobsen et al, 2018 ; Howard et al, 2012 ; Jensen et al, 2011 ; Jensen et al, 2012a ; Kold et al, 2012 ; Luk et al, 2010 ; Myhr & Augestad, 2013 ; Pereira et al, 2019 ; Saltychev et al, 2014 ; Sorensen et al, 2010 ; Stapelfeldt et al, 2011 ; Streibelt & Bethge, 2014 ; Sjöström et al, 2013 ; Sullivan & Simon, 2012 ; Sullivan & Adams, 2010 ; Sullivan et al, 2012 ; Tavares Figueiredo et al, 2016 ). Of the remaining 54% of studies containing a control group, 61% of them ( Berglund et al, 2018 ; Bergström et al, 2012 ; Busch et al, 2011 ; Busch et al, 2018 ; Campello et al, 2012 ; Chaléat-Valayer et al, 2016 ; Frederiksen et al, 2017 ; Hara, Bjørngaard,...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So wird bspw. die Funktionsfähigkeit der oberen Extremitäten nur dann getestet, wenn aufgrund eingeschränkter Motorik von Hand und/oder Arm auch entsprechende Therapie-Elemente durch den Arzt verordnet wurden [10] (▶tab. 2).…”
Section: Erhebungsinstrumenteunclassified
“…Der MCID gibt an, inwiefern eine gemessene Veränderung für den Patienten oder den Kliniker relevant ist [9]. Unterscheiden sich die alten und neuen Behandlungsergebnisse höchstens um den MCID, so wären die Konzepte als gleichwertig zu betrachten [10]. Übersteigt bzw.…”
Section: Festlegung Der Minimal Klinisch Relevanten Unterschiedeunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation