Physical Function and Mental Health in Trauma Intensive Care Patients

Aitken, Leanne M.; Macfarlane, Bonnie; Chaboyer, Wendy; Schuetz, Michael; Joyce, Christopher; Barnett, Adrian

doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001481

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Length of follow-up was consistent for all study participants in all but two studies [25,26,56]. The same results were found regarding whether follow-up time was sufficient for measuring primary outcomes, with only two studies reporting an insufficient follow-up period [24,47].…”

Section: Quality Of Studiessupporting

confidence: 68%

“…Out of the 44 articles that were included in our systematic review, most (n = 12) reported findings from a single prospective cohort study conducted in New Zealand [14, 27-37]. Seven articles were published using data from Australia [24][25][26][39][40][41][42], with two articles related to the same study cohort from Victoria [41,42] and two articles related to the same cohort from South-East Queensland [25,26]. Five articles reported on five unique studies conducted in the United States [38,53,57,64,65].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018

Geraerds

Richardson

Haagsma

et al. 2020

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Studies examining the impact of injury on health-related quality of life (HRQL) over time are necessary to understand the short-and long-term consequences of injury for population health. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an evidence update on studies that have measured HRQL over time in general injury populations using a generic (general) health state measure. Methods: Studies conducted between 2010 and 2018 that assessed HRQL at more than one time point among general injury populations were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently extracted information from each study on design, HRQL measure used, method of HRQL measure administration, timing of assessment(s), predictive variables, ability to detect change, and findings. Quality appraisals of each study were also completed by two reviewers using items from the RTI Item Bank on Risk of Bias and Precision of Observational Studies and the Guidelines for the Conduction of Follow-up Studies Measuring Injury-Related Disability. Results: Twenty-nine studies (44 articles) that met the inclusion criteria were identified. HRQL was measured using 14 different generic measures; the SF-36, SF-12, and EQ-5D were used most frequently. A varying number of follow-up assessments were undertaken, ranging from one to five. Follow-up often occurred 12 months post-injury. Fewer studies (n = 11) examined outcomes two or more years post-injury, and only one to 10 years post-injury. While most studies documented improvements in HRQL over time since the injury event, study populations had not returned to pre-injury status or reached general population norm HRQL values at post-injury follow-ups. Conclusions: Since 2010 there has been a substantial increase in the number of studies evaluating the HRQL of general injury populations. However, significant variability in study design continues to impede quantification of the impact of injury on population health over time. Variation between studies is particularly evident with respect to timing and number of follow-up assessments, and selection of instruments to evaluate HRQL.

show abstract

Section: Quality Of Studiessupporting

confidence: 68%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018

Geraerds

Richardson

Haagsma

et al. 2020

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The possible explanations might be that patients' worries about their disease would added to their psychological burden. In addition, previous research also suggested that patients' illness perception was associated with their mental distress and mental health outcome (Aitken et al, 2016). Regression analysis showed that the disease duration and levels of inflammatory markers were two factors related to self-perceived illness severity.…”

Section: Tablementioning

confidence: 86%

Factors related to mental health of inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China

Hu¹,

Chen²,

Zheng³

et al. 2020

Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

132

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre-including this research content-immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

show abstract

“…This may be explained as follows: First, in the five eligible studies, the shortest intervention time was 20 weeks, and the longest one was only 36 weeks. So the results may be restricted for the dimensions of physical function and social function, which may generate a positive effect for a long‐term intervention (Aitken et al., ). Therefore, for future related studies, our review suggested that the intervention time should be more than 1 year.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tai Chi Exercise for the Quality of Life in a Perimenopausal Women Organization: A Systematic Review

Wang

Shan

et al. 2017

Worldviews Ev Based Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review found significant evidence for Tai Chi improving bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health of SF-36, and the spine dimension of BMD in patients with perimenopausal syndrome. Findings suggest that Tai Chi might be recommended as effective and safe adjuvant treatment for patients with perimenopausal syndrome. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to confirm these results.

show abstract

Physical Function and Mental Health in Trauma Intensive Care Patients

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link Conflicts of Interest and

Cited by 25 publications

References 31 publications

A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018

A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010–2018

Factors related to mental health of inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China

Tai Chi Exercise for the Quality of Life in a Perimenopausal Women Organization: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About