Physical forces modulate cell differentiation and proliferation processes

Abstract

Currently, the predominant hypothesis explains cellular differentiation and behaviour as an essentially genetically driven intracellular process, suggesting a gene‐centrism paradigm. However, although many living species genetic has now been described, there is still a large gap between the genetic information interpretation and cell behaviour prediction. Indeed, the physical mechanisms underlying the cell differentiation and proliferation, which are now known or suspected to guide such as the flow of energy through cells and tissues, have been often overlooked. We thus here propose a complementary conceptual framework towards the development of an energy‐oriented classification of cell properties, that is, a mitochondria‐centrism hypothesis based on physical forces‐driven principles. A literature review on the physical–biological interactions in a number of various biological processes is analysed from the point of view of the fluid and solid mechanics, electricity and thermodynamics. There is consistent evidence that physical forces control cell proliferation and differentiation. We propose that physical forces interfere with the cell metabolism mostly at the level of the mitochondria, which in turn control gene expression. The present perspective points towards a paradigm shift complement in biology.

Pressure Stimuli Improve the Proliferation of Wharton’s Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Hypoxic Culture Conditions

“…In further studies, based on the mRNA sequencing data, we are planning to screen the predicted therapeutic candidates that are expected to show therapeutic potential on muscle disease, and investigate their MoA. Many studies have attempted to promote the proliferation of MSCs, by genetic modification, the application of scaffolds, and the modification of the cultivation conditions [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. In particular, through genetic modification, the target genes related to cell proliferation or the cell cycle could be overexpressed [ 30 ].…”

ClC-3/SGK1 regulatory axis enhances the olaparib-induced antitumor effect in human stomach adenocarcinoma

“…Cell migration process requires many factors, such as the cytoskeleton, cell-matrix adhesion and cell volume regulation 29 . When the cell proliferation is inhibited, a broad range of cellular characteristics will be orchestrated, including the matrix environmental and cell mechanical properties, which is of importance to the cell migration and contributes to the invasive phenotype of cancer cells [30][31][32] . Our previous study has showed that the cell cycle also plays an important role in controlling cell migration and cell volume 33,34 .…”

Electrospinning Live Cells Using Gelatin and Pullulan

“…When the membrane is forced to change shape, it will distort the cytoskeleton of the cell, which attaches the cell membrane to the nucleus. This change in the cytoskeleton will affect the expressed genes and cause the creation of different cell signals, which could induce differentiation [13]. Incorporating stem cells into the electrospinning process will expose them to an electric field that likely induces unique behaviors (i.e., cell differentiation) as previously reported while using lower voltages [14,15].…”