2017
DOI: 10.3390/biology6030032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Forces May Cause the HoxD Gene Cluster Elongation

Abstract: Hox gene collinearity was discovered be Edward B. Lewis in 1978. It consists of the Hox1, Hox2, Hox3 ordering of the Hox genes in the chromosome from the telomeric to the centromeric side of the chromosome. Surprisingly, the spatial activation of the Hox genes in the ontogenetic units of the embryo follows the same ordering along the anterior-posterior embryonic axis. The chromosome microscale differs from the embryo macroscale by 3 to 4 orders of magnitude. The traditional biomolecular mechanisms are not adeq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If spatial and temporal collinearity of Hox gene expression is indeed maintained by close physical proximity of Hox genes in a compact cluster (Ferraiuolo et al 2010;Mallo and Alonso 2013;Papageorgiou 2017), invasion of TEs could interfere with Hox cluster function by increasing intergenic distances between Hox genes. Insertion of TEs could also introduce novel cis-regulatory elements (Slotkin and Martienssen 2007;Feschotte 2008;Cowley and Oakey 2013;Sundaram et al 2014), or affect chromatin modifications (Kidwell and Lisch 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If spatial and temporal collinearity of Hox gene expression is indeed maintained by close physical proximity of Hox genes in a compact cluster (Ferraiuolo et al 2010;Mallo and Alonso 2013;Papageorgiou 2017), invasion of TEs could interfere with Hox cluster function by increasing intergenic distances between Hox genes. Insertion of TEs could also introduce novel cis-regulatory elements (Slotkin and Martienssen 2007;Feschotte 2008;Cowley and Oakey 2013;Sundaram et al 2014), or affect chromatin modifications (Kidwell and Lisch 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding supports the hypothesis of pulling forces of BM with the associated ratchet -type ordering of the Hox genes. HGC is the outcome of these forces [17,25]. The vertebrate Hox gene clusters obey a primitive symmetry of self similarity and the ratchet-type ordering of the Hox genes could be the partly conserved quantity in the Noether theory spirit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). In this model the forces depend on both macro and micro influences and the Hox cluster behaves like an expanding elastic spring [25,26]. In the Evolutionary process, each Hox gene of the cluster is endowed with specific features and a functional role.…”
Section: Hox Gene Collinearity On a Straight Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as 2001, a biophysical model (BM) was proposed, which combines long-range gradients based mainly on diffusion, causing pulling forces at the level of theHox clusters [15][16][17][18]. For many years this model was poorly endorsed because supporting experimental evidence was lacking.…”
Section: The Macro-and Micro-influences In the Biophysical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions (transcription factories) are studied in depth by Cook and collaborators [28]. In this model, the force F of Equation (3) depends on both macro (P) and micro (N) influences, and the Hox cluster behaves like an expanding elastic spring [17,18]. The factor P in Equation (3) varies according to the cell position along the morphogen gradient in the anterior-posterior axis.…”
Section: The Macro-and Micro-influences In the Biophysical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%