2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2013)156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical factorisation scheme for PDFs for non-inclusive applications

Abstract: We introduce the physical factorisation scheme, which is necessary to describe observables which are `not completely inclusive'. We derive the formulae for NLO DGLAP evolution in this scheme, and also for the `rotation' of the conventional MSbar PDFs into the physical representation. Unlike, the MSbar prescription, where, for example, the gluon PDF at NLO obtains an admixture of the quark-singlet PDF, and vice-versa, the physical approach does not mix parton PDFs of different types. That is, the physical appro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(and HERA electroproduction) data be included in a global PDF fit? One possibility would be to use the above k T factorisation approach and then to transform the result to the MS scheme following [19]. Another possibility is to work in the MS scheme from the beginning, using the optimal factorisation scale obtained from resumming the a x Q ln 1 ln s n 2 ( ( ) ( )) terms, and accounting for the Q 0 power corrections as described in [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(and HERA electroproduction) data be included in a global PDF fit? One possibility would be to use the above k T factorisation approach and then to transform the result to the MS scheme following [19]. Another possibility is to work in the MS scheme from the beginning, using the optimal factorisation scale obtained from resumming the a x Q ln 1 ln s n 2 ( ( ) ( )) terms, and accounting for the Q 0 power corrections as described in [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can solve it by using a dedicated Monte Carlo factorization scheme [9,12] which redefines projection operators, however, this is beyond the scope of this work and we will not investigate it here. Let us just mention that similar idea has been investigated by Oliveira et al [18,19] in the context of physical factorization scheme allowing for better convergence of perturbative series.…”
Section: Status Of the Calculationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently there has been renewed interest in developing alternative factorization schemes [320,[363][364][365][366][367][368], including to investigate the positivity of MS PDFs [320] and to simplify Monte Carlo calculations [365][366][367][368]368]. PDFs in different factorization schemes are related to each other, and to those in the MS scheme, by a transition operator that mixes PDFs of different flavors, f FS = K MS→FS ⊗ f MS , so that for each flavor a we have…”
Section: Factorization Schemes For Event Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%