2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl076751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Explanation of Archie's Porosity Exponent in Granular Materials: A Process‐Based, Pore‐Scale Numerical Study

Abstract: The empirical Archie's law has been widely used in geosciences and engineering to explain the measured electrical resistivity of many geological materials, but its physical basis has not been fully understood yet. In this study, we use a pore‐scale numerical approach combining discrete element‐finite difference methods to study Archie's porosity exponent m of granular materials over a wide porosity range. Numerical results reveal that at dilute states (e.g., porosity ϕ > ~65%), m is exclusively related to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The code applies a uniform electric field across the sample and then solves the spatial electric potential and current density in the sample with the conjugate gradient method. Based on averaged current density, Ohm's law can be used to calculate the effective electrical conductivity of the sample σ eff (e.g., Niu & Zhang, ). Since σ eff is solely from the ionic conduction in the bulk solution, the formation factor F of the sample can be simply determined as F = σ f / σ eff .…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The code applies a uniform electric field across the sample and then solves the spatial electric potential and current density in the sample with the conjugate gradient method. Based on averaged current density, Ohm's law can be used to calculate the effective electrical conductivity of the sample σ eff (e.g., Niu & Zhang, ). Since σ eff is solely from the ionic conduction in the bulk solution, the formation factor F of the sample can be simply determined as F = σ f / σ eff .…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two samples are used in this study: a synthetic loosely packed ooids sample (Sample 1) and a carbonate mudstone (Sample 2). The ooids sample (Figure a) with the initial porosity ϕ = 30.2% is obtained using the discrete element method by compressing sparsely distributed spherical particles (e.g., Niu & Zhang, ). The carbonate mudstone sample has a porosity of ~13% (from helium measurement) and is from the Wellington Formation, KS; its microstructural image in Figure a is from micro‐computed tomography scan data after segmentation.…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ w is the fluid conductivity, ϕ int is the interconnected porosity, and S is the aqueous saturation. The cementation exponent m is dependent on the rate of change in pore complexity with porosity (Yue 2019), and on particle shape and orientation (Niu and Zhang 2018), and typically varies between 1.2 and 4.4 (Lesmes and Friedman 2005). A value of 1.8, which has been previously applied to represent Hanford sediments (Johnson and Wellman 2013), was used.…”
Section: Transformation Of Flow and Transport Parameters To Bulk Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that surface conduction is neglected in Equation 4 because of the low clay content of most Hanford sediments. The cementation exponent m is related to the pore tortuosity and connectivity, dependent on particle shape and orientation (e.g., Niu and Zhang ) and typically varies between 1.2 and 4.4 (Lesmes and Friedman ). For the Hanford B‐Complex, a representative value of 1.27 was used.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%