2019
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201901436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Expansion of Layered Graphene Oxide Nanosheets by Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal–Organic Frameworks and their Thermal Conversion into Nitrogen‐Doped Porous Carbons for Supercapacitor Applications

Abstract: Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets show good electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance in electrochemical devices. However, strong van der Waals attraction between adjacent nanosheets causes GO materials to collapse, reducing the exposed surfaces and limiting electron/ion transport in porous electrodes. GO nanosheets mixed with Zn5(OH)8(NO3)2⋅2 H2O (ZnON) nanoplates create a layered composite structure. Exposing the resultant GO/ZnON to 2‐methylimidazole vapor leads to the conversion of ZnON into the zeolit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on the degree of graphitization of the samples was characterized using Raman spectroscopy. As shown in Figure b, the CNFs film shows two broad bands at 1356.28 and 1575.35 cm –1 , representing the D-band and G-band, which indicates defective/disordered and graphitized carbon, respectively. , The samples after the CVD process, on the other hand, show two relatively sharp bands at 1344.31 and 1572.70 cm –1 , and the peak area fraction ratio of the D and G bands ( I D / I G ) decreased from 2.73 to 1.69, which, combined with the characterization results of HRTEM (Figure h), indicate the generation of CNTs with higher graphitization. The surface area of CNTs-CNFs composites was measured by N 2 gas adsorption/desorption test analysis and compared with CNFs as shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Information on the degree of graphitization of the samples was characterized using Raman spectroscopy. As shown in Figure b, the CNFs film shows two broad bands at 1356.28 and 1575.35 cm –1 , representing the D-band and G-band, which indicates defective/disordered and graphitized carbon, respectively. , The samples after the CVD process, on the other hand, show two relatively sharp bands at 1344.31 and 1572.70 cm –1 , and the peak area fraction ratio of the D and G bands ( I D / I G ) decreased from 2.73 to 1.69, which, combined with the characterization results of HRTEM (Figure h), indicate the generation of CNTs with higher graphitization. The surface area of CNTs-CNFs composites was measured by N 2 gas adsorption/desorption test analysis and compared with CNFs as shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The XPS C 1s and O 1s spectra of NSC-700-3 and KNSC-700-3 are depicted in Figure S4. The XPS N 1s spectra of NSC-700-3 and KNSC-700-3 have four distinct peaks located at 398.4, 400.4, 401.9, and 404.4 eV, which are attributed to pyridinic N (N-6), pyrrolic N (N-5), graphitic N (N–Q), and pyridinic N–oxide (N–O) (Figure e) . The presence of KOH promotes the transformation of the least stable pyrrolic N to graphitic N species having the highest stability and higher conductivity.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XPS C 1s and O 1s spectra of 2e). 44 The presence of KOH promotes the transformation of the least stable pyrrolic N to graphitic N species having the highest stability and higher conductivity. 45 Notably, the relative peak intensity of thiophene sulfur to oxidized sulfur in KNSC-700-3 is smaller than that in NSC-700-3 due to the etching effect of KOH.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R sl and C sl represent the surface‐layer resistance and surface‐layer capacitance and/or interfacial capacitance, respectively [33] . The surface layer resistance and surface layer capacitance interpretation for the slight semicircle at high frequency range, charge‐transfer resistance ( R ct ), [34] the inclination of the curves at middle frequency range indicates the presence of Warburg diffusion impedance (W 1 and W 2 ) [35] . A double layer capacitance ( C dl ) is in parallel to R ct , and a capacitance C p was incorporated in series with W 2 to estimate the effect of pseudocapacitance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%