1991
DOI: 10.2307/256397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Environments and Employee Reactions: Effects of Stimulus-Screening Skills and Job Complexity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, technical difficulties may decrease learning and increase attrition from training. However, research suggests that there is variability in how people respond to interruptions and some people are more sensitive to interruptions than others (Jett & George, 2003;Kirmeyer, 1988;Oldham, Kulik, & Stepina, 1991). We contribute to this research stream by examining whether pretraining motivation moderates the effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition.…”
Section: An Overview Of Technical Difficulties and Workplace Interrupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, technical difficulties may decrease learning and increase attrition from training. However, research suggests that there is variability in how people respond to interruptions and some people are more sensitive to interruptions than others (Jett & George, 2003;Kirmeyer, 1988;Oldham, Kulik, & Stepina, 1991). We contribute to this research stream by examining whether pretraining motivation moderates the effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition.…”
Section: An Overview Of Technical Difficulties and Workplace Interrupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sundstrom, Burt, & Kamp, 1980;Toker & Gray, 2008;Zalesny & Farace, 1987), and workers' reactions to spatial density (e.g. May et al, 2005;Oldham, Kulik, & Stepina, 1991). Research on creative work environments rarely includes elements of the physical work environment.…”
Section: Physical Work Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in terms of performance, Oldham, Kulik and Stepina (1991) find that open-plan offices reduce employee performance on simple tasks and improve performance on complex tasks, while Block and Stokes (1989) find that performance is better in a private setting for those working on complex tasks and in offices is that open-plan offices improve collaboration (Vischer, 1999(Vischer, , 2006. Furthermore, researchers, such as Boutellier et al (2008), have suggested that the main way office space can shape organisational outcomes, such as innovation and performance, is by changing the patterns of communication among employees (see also Monge et al, 1985;Waber et al, 2014).…”
Section: Current Debates On Open-plan Officesmentioning
confidence: 99%