2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01359.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical disturbance determines effects from nitrogen addition on ground vegetation in boreal coniferous forests

Abstract: Questions: Nitrogen (N) enrichment often appears in combination with landuse related disturbances. Are there interactive effects between N addition and physical disturbances where N addition increases plant community sensitivity to disturbance?Location: Boreal coniferous forest, Bispgården (63°00′N, 16°40′E), centralSweden. Methods:We tested potential interactive effects between N addition and disturbance by evaluating effects of N fertilization on community composition of forest floor vegetation in clear-cut … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously added N retained in the soil layer may thus be accessible to above ground vegetation as N mineralization rates increases after clear-felling and soil scarification. Previous studies of the same sites as used in the present study revealed fertilizer induced shifts in species composition of the forest floor vegetation [20,23]. In combination with the results from the present study this clearly demonstrates that carry-over effects from previous fertilization events influence several components of the ecosystem, resulting in a long-lasting effect on site productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously added N retained in the soil layer may thus be accessible to above ground vegetation as N mineralization rates increases after clear-felling and soil scarification. Previous studies of the same sites as used in the present study revealed fertilizer induced shifts in species composition of the forest floor vegetation [20,23]. In combination with the results from the present study this clearly demonstrates that carry-over effects from previous fertilization events influence several components of the ecosystem, resulting in a long-lasting effect on site productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…When fertilizing forests, a large part of the N added is retained in the soil layer [21,22]. Strengbom and Nordin [23] suggested that the disturbance from harvest and site scarification leads to increased mineralization rates of immobilized soil N, explaining why effects of previous (more than 25 years ago) N fertilization was more evident in the early phase of the subsequent stand rotation than within the same stand rotation that were fertilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and amensalism from the tree layer (Thomas et al. ; Strengbom and Nordin ). Additionally, when the warming experiment was commenced, the optimized fertilization experiment had been ongoing for several years, and the trees and understorey were already significantly affected (Bergh et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least three possible reasons for why the effects of warming in most cases were smaller in fertilized than in unfertilized stands: (1) the potential effect of increased nutrient mineralization may be smaller in fertilized stands; (2) the abundance of the forest floor vegetation was strongly reduced by fertilization, implying smaller possible effect sizes; and (3) the reduction in light on the forest floor as an effect of increased canopy cover strongly reduced the possibilities of understorey plants to utilize an increased nutrient supply for growth. None of these reasons exclude each other, but it has been suggested that the effects of increased nutrient availability on boreal forest floor vegetation are strongly mediated by both competition within strata (Strengbom et al 2004) and amensalism from the tree layer (Thomas et al 1999;Strengbom and Nordin 2012). Additionally, when the warming experiment was commenced, the optimized fertilization experiment had been ongoing for several years, and the trees and understorey were already significantly affected , which most likely contributed to this difference in effect of warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising, since this species has often been considered an indicator of increased nitrogen availability in boreal forest (e.g., Strengbom and Nordin 2012). This is surprising, since this species has often been considered an indicator of increased nitrogen availability in boreal forest (e.g., Strengbom and Nordin 2012).…”
Section: Changes In Species Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%