Physical Disability and Labor Market Discrimination: Evidence From a Field Experiment

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. We investigate the determinants and extent of labor market discrimination toward people with physical disabilities using a large scale field experiment. Applications were randomly sent to 1477 private firms advertising open positions. We find that average callback rates of disabled and non-disabled applicants are respectively 14.4% and 7.2%. We find this differential does not result from accessibility constraints related to firm infrastructures. We also find that mentioning eligibility to a government subsidy to cover the cost of workplace adaptation does not increase callback rates. Finally, we estimate that a lower bound of the proportion of discriminating firms is 49.7%. JEL-Codes: J710, J680. Terms of use: Documents in

Disability and Regulatory Approaches to Employer Engagement: Cross-National Challenges in Bridging the Gap between Motivation and Hiring Practice

“…How do employers incorporate such rights into their hiring practices? A paradox in research on employer attitudes and hiring practices in relation to disabled people is that employers often express positive attitudes (Burke et al, 2013;Ju et al, 2013) but show negative hiring intentions and behaviour (Baert, 2014;Araten-Bergman, 2016;Ameri et al, 2018;Bellemare et al, 2018;Shamshiri-Petersen and Krogh, 2020;Bjørnshagen and Ugreninov, 2021). Bredgaard (2018) underlines the importance of not conflating behaviour and attitudes, and proposes a model uniting a behavioural and an attitudinal dimension.…”

Community lives of adolescents across multiple special needs: Discrimination, community belonging, trusted people, leisure activities, and friends

“…It is well established that discrimination toward those with disabilities is embedded in structural and interpersonal aspects of social life (Dirth & Branscombe, 2017). For example, Bellemare et al (2018) found that job applicants who disclosed a physical disability in their application were less likely to receive a call-back for a job interview. Our results illuminate the discrimination that youth in high school already experience, which has implications for shaping their transition to adulthood, including transitions to postsecondary education and employment.…”

Video Resumes and Job Search Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment

“…6 Other components include included gender (when relevant), availability of a government sponsored subsidy, and work history (years of experience, unemployment spells). An unpublished working paper using data from the benchmark experiment documents that none of these variables significantly determine callback rates (see Bellemare et al (2018) for details). The computer program ensured consistency between all components of the CV.…”