2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical, chemical, biological and ecotoxicological properties of wastewater discharged from Davis Station, Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012, an assessment was made of the environmental impacts from sewage discharge at Australia's Davis station (Australia 2012a;Stark et al 2015). The wastewater generated was found to be more concentrated than standard municipal wastewater and considered to be more variable in composition.…”
Section: Box 1 Davis Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2012, an assessment was made of the environmental impacts from sewage discharge at Australia's Davis station (Australia 2012a;Stark et al 2015). The wastewater generated was found to be more concentrated than standard municipal wastewater and considered to be more variable in composition.…”
Section: Box 1 Davis Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such activities can lead to chemical contamination, untreated wastewater discharge, introduction of non-native species, overfishing, and physical alterations to the landscape (e.g. Tin et al 2009;O'Neill et al 2015;Stark et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators examined contaminant effects on Arctic and Antarctic marine species. Stark et al (2015) examined the many properties of wastewaters at Davis Station, East Antarctica, including the following:…”
Section: Toxicity Of Wastewatersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shackletoni (N = 93) and A. philippii (N = 44). A recent evaluation of the dispersion and dilution of wastewater at Davis Station found that elevated levels of toxic contaminants (metals, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, nutrients and faecal sterols) are accumulating within 2 km of the station's outfall (Stark et al 2015). Samples were collected from 5 sites (red dots in Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%