2012
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/23/8/085404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical characterization and performance evaluation of an x-ray micro-computed tomography system for dimensional metrology applications

Abstract: This paper presents physical and metrological characterization measurements conducted for an industrial x-ray micro-computed tomography (CT) system. As is well known in CT metrology, many factors, e.g., in the scanning and reconstruction process, the image processing, and the 3D data evaluation, influence the dimensional measurement properties of the system as a whole. Therefore, it is important to know what leads to, and what are the consequences of, e.g., a geometrical misalignment of the scanner system, ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The good short-term repeatability observed in CT measurements and the relevant role played by the bias, are in consonance with results reported by other authors [6][7]. The estimated biases, clearly affected by edge-related determination errors, lie within the empirical error band proposed by the authors in a recent paper [4], and therefore reinforce their estimation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The good short-term repeatability observed in CT measurements and the relevant role played by the bias, are in consonance with results reported by other authors [6][7]. The estimated biases, clearly affected by edge-related determination errors, lie within the empirical error band proposed by the authors in a recent paper [4], and therefore reinforce their estimation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…X-ray CT collects a series of radiographs through a 360-degree rotation of the work-piece that are then reconstructed to create a 3D model of the examined object. The produced X-rays need to have sufficient energy to penetrate the examined object and travel to the detector where the radiographs are collected [22]. In a well-calibrated CT system, the quality of the radiographs depends on the characteristics of the X-rays, the settings of the detector and the exposure time per radiograph.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected CT data has been proven to be possibly influenced by bi-directional repeatability of the system, radial run-out errors, the detector tilt and type and the movement of the spot size of the X-ray in the duration of a scan [34][35][36][37][38]. The reduction of artefacts in affected data can be achieved by following the recommendations provided by VDI/VDE 2630 Part 1.4; a guide to obtain dimensional measurements through CT [39].…”
Section: X-ray Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%