1974
DOI: 10.2307/2786463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Attractiveness and Peer Perception Among Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
9

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
83
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus research on children's perceptions of adults is necessary in order to test for agerelated differences in perceptions of attractiveness. Research is also needed to examine school aged children because although research has been conducted with young and preschool aged children (see Dion, 1973;Dion & Berscheid, 1974;Langlois & Downs, 1979;Styczynski & Langlois, 1977) and adults (e.g., Berscheid, Dion, Walster, & Walster, 1971), few studies have been directed toward the elementary school years (for exceptions see Langlois & Stephan, 1977;Langlois & Styczynski, 1979).…”
Section: Variability In Stereotype Directionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus research on children's perceptions of adults is necessary in order to test for agerelated differences in perceptions of attractiveness. Research is also needed to examine school aged children because although research has been conducted with young and preschool aged children (see Dion, 1973;Dion & Berscheid, 1974;Langlois & Downs, 1979;Styczynski & Langlois, 1977) and adults (e.g., Berscheid, Dion, Walster, & Walster, 1971), few studies have been directed toward the elementary school years (for exceptions see Langlois & Stephan, 1977;Langlois & Styczynski, 1979).…”
Section: Variability In Stereotype Directionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some theories, such as alliance models and assortative models (e.g., homophily theory, McPherson et al (2001)), predict that the network will be largely composed of pairs of mutual best friends, due to preferences for loyalty and exclusivity (in alliances) or preferences for similarity (in age, sex, geographic location, etc.). In contrast, other theories predict that the network should have many star structures, which contain multiple best-frienders organized around a central popular individual, due to preferences for specific traits such as intelligence, caring, or attractiveness (Dion and Berscheid, 1974;Langlois et al, 2000). A third possibility is that people do not view best friends as closer than other friends.…”
Section: Supporting Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Numerous previous studies have demonstrated the importance of physical attractiveness in different social situations (Walster, Aronson, Abrahams, & Rottmann, 1966;Dion & Berscheid, 1974;Adams & Huston, 1975). In their famous "computer dance" study, Walster et al (1966) found that the only predictor of interaction quality was the physical attractiveness of a person's date.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Precedentsmentioning
confidence: 97%