2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical attraction to reliable, low variability nervous systems: Reaction time variability predicts attractiveness

Abstract: The human face cues a range of important fitness information, which guides mate selection towards desirable others. Given humans' high investment in the central nervous system (CNS), cues to CNS function should be especially important in social selection. We tested if facial attractiveness preferences are sensitive to the reliability of human nervous system function. Several decades of research suggest an operational measure for CNS reliability is reaction time variability, which is measured by standard deviat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with high or low sociosexuality also possess distinct facial appearances that observers are able to discriminate between (Boothroyd, Jones, Burt, DeBruine, & Perrett, 2008). The method of extremes has also been employed to uncover surprising relationships between appearances on measures such as reaction time variability, with individuals with faster and more consistent reaction times possessing more attractive faces on average (Butler, Saville, Ward, & Ramsey, 2017).…”
Section: The 'Methods Of Extremes'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with high or low sociosexuality also possess distinct facial appearances that observers are able to discriminate between (Boothroyd, Jones, Burt, DeBruine, & Perrett, 2008). The method of extremes has also been employed to uncover surprising relationships between appearances on measures such as reaction time variability, with individuals with faster and more consistent reaction times possessing more attractive faces on average (Butler, Saville, Ward, & Ramsey, 2017).…”
Section: The 'Methods Of Extremes'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical attraction has a positive effect on parent-child relationships (Lanoë, et al, 2017), teacher-student relationships (Määttä, et al, 2014), marriage relationships (McNulty et al, 2008;Poulsen et al, 2013), interviewer-applicant relationships (James, 2000;Aminoff and Tanskanen, 2013) and jurycriminal relationships (Walker and Panfil, 2017). In addition, physical attractiveness is positively associated with predicting status (Brumbaugh et al, 2014), position (Korobov and Bamberg, 2004), health (Butler et al, 2017) and social behavior (Pepping et al, 2017). Thus, when selecting employees, companies tend to prefer employees who look attractive (Hurley-Hanson and Giannantonio, 2006).…”
Section: Interpersonal Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%