2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and numerical characterization of the near-eutectic permeability of aluminum–copper alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor 5 is an empirical fitting factor which seems to provide good agreement with experimental data over a wide range of solid fractions g s for the case of an isotropic porous medium composed of unconsolidated material [12,13,28,29]. In order to assess the ability of the new 3-D fluid flow model to predict the bulk permeability a series of isothermal flow simulations were performed at various g s values in the interval [0, 1] with the following boundary conditions: a constant pressure p 0 , i.e.…”
Section: Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor 5 is an empirical fitting factor which seems to provide good agreement with experimental data over a wide range of solid fractions g s for the case of an isotropic porous medium composed of unconsolidated material [12,13,28,29]. In order to assess the ability of the new 3-D fluid flow model to predict the bulk permeability a series of isothermal flow simulations were performed at various g s values in the interval [0, 1] with the following boundary conditions: a constant pressure p 0 , i.e.…”
Section: Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerically calculated permeabilities for N equal to 50 are in close agreement with the permeabilities measured on the physical models (within ±20% of those determined through measurement). The differences between the numerically calculated and experimentally measured permeabilities can be attributed to the measurement uncertainties as discussed in [8]. The comparison of results for N equal to 50 suggests that the numerical modeling techniques employed in this study provide a good representation of the physics of this problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A detailed description of the apparatus and testing procedure used in this study can be found in [8]. Fig.…”
Section: Physical Determination Of Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have calculated the permeability of two-dimensional (2D) dendritic structures obtained from sections of cast alloys [16,17], while some researchers have determined the permeability of three-dimensional (3-D) microstructures [15,[18][19][20][21][22]. Early research on complex 3-D microstructures [18][19][20] employed domains discretized with uniform cubic elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James et al [14] passed oil through a large-scale physical model of repeating slotted plates to measure permeability. Khajeh and Maijer [15] developed a physical modeling technique to measure the permeability of dendritic structures by passing a glycerin-based solution through large-scale analogs of interdendritic structures produced by rapid prototyping. The results of these studies [13][14][15] indicate that experiments on physical models are a suitable alternative to permeameter measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%