2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.10.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and mechanical properties of tissue equivalents from porcine connective tissue, devitalized by cryoirradiation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, after subsequent treatments with low temperature and irradiation, the physical and chemical changes within the pericardium tissue resulted in a cascade of structural rearrangements, which led to the formation of additional cross links and more stable connective-tissue structure, preventing early enzymatic graft biodegradation within the recipient organism. These findings allow us to conclude that the modified tissue with the given characteristics could persist for a long time within the conditions of the body (which enabled repopulation and new structural formation processes), endure work load during functioning, while preserving tensile property and resistance to fracture and twisting (12, 17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, after subsequent treatments with low temperature and irradiation, the physical and chemical changes within the pericardium tissue resulted in a cascade of structural rearrangements, which led to the formation of additional cross links and more stable connective-tissue structure, preventing early enzymatic graft biodegradation within the recipient organism. These findings allow us to conclude that the modified tissue with the given characteristics could persist for a long time within the conditions of the body (which enabled repopulation and new structural formation processes), endure work load during functioning, while preserving tensile property and resistance to fracture and twisting (12, 17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%