2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and mechanical performance of magnesium-based construction boards: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, frequencies around 2500 Hz, which include music or talking, are poorly masked by gypsum boards [34]. Thus, the use of other materials that can increase the sound insulation at the cited frequencies can be of interest for architects and engineers [26,27,[35][36][37][38][39]. The construction and building industry is continuously in the search of innovative solutions, particularly those that are more lightweight, sustainable, and cost-efficient [40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, frequencies around 2500 Hz, which include music or talking, are poorly masked by gypsum boards [34]. Thus, the use of other materials that can increase the sound insulation at the cited frequencies can be of interest for architects and engineers [26,27,[35][36][37][38][39]. The construction and building industry is continuously in the search of innovative solutions, particularly those that are more lightweight, sustainable, and cost-efficient [40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the better performing MgO boards, particularly those produced from MOC cement, were found to have superior or comparable performance with that of conventional board types such as fibre cement, gypsum plasterboard and wood-based boards using commonly adopted test methods for the assessment of sheeting materials [25]. These findings also suggest that MgO boards, manufactured appropriately, perform adequately initially, and subsequently do not provide any indication that they will not continue to do so over their intended service life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study focuses on the effect of moisture and temperature on MgO boards, particularly boards produced with MOC cement, as it was MOC based boards that were identified to have caused the issues in Denmark. Extended exposure durations and different types of exposure conditions are investigated and compared with previous studies [24,25]. Specifically, MgO boards were exposed to high relative humidity (RH) and various temperatures for extended durations up to 840 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Rusthi et al [42] analyzed the details of thermal properties tests and fire resistance tests of LSF wall systems (Light Steel Frame) lined with MgO boards with different configurations. The thermal properties tests performed on the two types of MgO boards showed that MgO boards lose a large amount of weight at increased temperatures, approximately 50% and 40% of the initial weight, whereas gypsumboard loses 15% of weight when used in a standard way.…”
Section: Resistance Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%