2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and mechanical characterization of a commercial rendering mortar using destructive and non-destructive techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slightly higher density of this by-product in comparison with other alternative products can be seen as either an advantage or a disadvantage. Its superficial roughness and high density are disadvantageous for highworkability concretes, although this problem can be solved by correct dosing of the fines content in the concrete mix [33,34]. This high density is also a drawback for EAFS concrete elements to be self-supported or supported by other structural elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slightly higher density of this by-product in comparison with other alternative products can be seen as either an advantage or a disadvantage. Its superficial roughness and high density are disadvantageous for highworkability concretes, although this problem can be solved by correct dosing of the fines content in the concrete mix [33,34]. This high density is also a drawback for EAFS concrete elements to be self-supported or supported by other structural elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples exhibited average Vp values of about 2300 m/s The average capillarity absorption coefficient (C) is about 27.75 g/m 2 s 0.5 , corresponding to an amount of water absorbed of about 15% typical of mortars. All the samples demonstrated a remarkably swift imbibition during the initial 60 min of the test, as the largest porosities became saturated through contact immediately [13,[34][35][36]. In addition, IC, P and ρ showed typical values for the mortar [37].…”
Section: Physical and Mechanical Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A literatura reporta que, na construção civil, métodos destrutivos e não destrutivos vêm sendo usados na determinação da rigidez de materiais cimentıćios (Carrasco et al, 2017;Aragon et al, 2019;Makoond, Pela e Molins, 2020). Existem diferentes técnicas não destrutivas que envolvem efeitos inerciais e propagação de ondas, onde são determinados os módulos dinâmicos.…”
Section: Introducãounclassified
“…Os valores de E obtidos com todas as metodologias usadas neste estudo são relativamente semelhantes uns aos outros. Ao comparar os resultados de todas as amostras, veri"ica-se uma mesma tendência de resultados, em que os valores de módulo dinâmico (obtido por ensaio vibracional) são mais elevados do que os de módulo de elasticidade estático, assim como reportado na literatura(Aragon et al, 2019;Marques et al, 2020). O módulo de elasticidade dinâmico (obtido com ensaios de propagação de ondas) do concreto é comumente observado com valores superiores ao de módulo de elasticidade de Young determinado com ensaios estáticos ou quase-es-táticos(Mehta e Monteiro, 2014), devido a pequenos efeitos de não linearidade fıśica do comportamento tensão-deformação (o módulo é ligeiramente menor para nıveis de defor-mações maiores).…”
unclassified