2018
DOI: 10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss1/art3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Biological Responses to Flow in a Tidal Freshwater Slough Complex

Abstract: Although brackish marsh has been the subject of decades of research, tidal freshwater regions are still poorly understood. To provide insight into spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrients, physical conditions, and the plankton community in freshwater tidal habitat, we investigated from 2011 to 2014 a remnant freshwater tidal slough complex located in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary. Our results suggest that the tidal slough complex showed different seasonal nutrient, phys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(136 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of zooplankton and nekton within the channel was strongly correlated with the hydrodynamically driven habitat zones described above. The upstream zone characterized by no exchange with downstream habitats supported higher zooplankton densities, and higher densities of Cladocera, a group more abundant in low‐velocity, freshwater habitats regionally (Frantzich et al, 2018; Kimmerer et al, 2018). The downstream, high exchange zone supported the lowest densities of zooplankton, which could reflect low phytoplankton abundance observed in the study or simply the relatively low densities of zooplankton present in many nearby SFE pelagic habitats (Kimmerer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of zooplankton and nekton within the channel was strongly correlated with the hydrodynamically driven habitat zones described above. The upstream zone characterized by no exchange with downstream habitats supported higher zooplankton densities, and higher densities of Cladocera, a group more abundant in low‐velocity, freshwater habitats regionally (Frantzich et al, 2018; Kimmerer et al, 2018). The downstream, high exchange zone supported the lowest densities of zooplankton, which could reflect low phytoplankton abundance observed in the study or simply the relatively low densities of zooplankton present in many nearby SFE pelagic habitats (Kimmerer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively high abundance and growth rates of Delta Smelt in the Yolo Bypass during recent years can be attributed to a combination of at least three factors: 1) high food density, 2) high turbidity, and 3) moderate temperature. First, calanoid copepod density from 2011–2014 was consistently higher in the Yolo Bypass than in the Sacramento River [16]. Calanoid copepods, including Pseudodiaptomus forbesi are the preferred prey for Delta Smelt [34], and dominated the diet composition of fish in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Lastly, while juvenile Delta Smelt can tolerate up to 27–28°C in a laboratory setting [75] and up to 25°C in the field [43], adult Delta Smelt seem to require a lower optimal temperature for long-term survival and spawning [75,76]. Future warming of the Yolo Bypass due to climate change may shorten the maturation and spawning windows of Delta Smelt in the spring and exclude the species from the region entirely in from late-spring to fall [16,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drift invertebrates are often a more substantial part of the food web in natural flood events in Yolo Bypass (Sommer et al 2001a(Sommer et al , 2001b(Sommer et al , 2004Benigno and Sommer 2009). Nonetheless, zooplankton densities can be relatively high in Yolo Bypass (as compared to the Sacramento River) during dry seasons and drought years (Frantzich et al 2018;Goertler et al 2018). The specific reasons for these differences include longer residence time and shallower depths in the Yolo Bypass than in adjacent perennial river channels (Sommer et al 2004).…”
Section: Flooded Farm Fields Support High Biological Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%