Physical activity is remarkable medicine. The 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans reported 27 major physical and mental health benefits with strong research support, all of which are compelling (eg, lower all-cause mortality). 1 Among these benefits, 9 were denoted as new for 2018. These new benefits are, of course, not new in the sense that active people in the past did not receive them; rather, they are new in the sense that sufficient evidence arose in metaanalyses to affirm them. In their systematic review and metaanalysis published in this issue of JAMA Pediatrics, Recchia et al 2 extend the evidence on health benefits of physical activity. Their meta-analysis includes data from more than 2400 youth who participated in more than 20 randomized clinical trial and quasi-experimental design studies. The review includes data collected by researchers in the US, China, Chile, Germany, Iran, Brazil, Thailand, and the UK over the past 35 years (though the majority were conducted in the past 10 years). The work is timely, aligning with the rise of mental health disorders in adolescents, 3 and the methods are rigorous (eg, random-effects models, risk-of-bias assessment, sensitivity analyses).The authors found a small association of physical activity interventions with improvement in depressive symptoms relative to comparison groups in youth, which was driven by moderate to large effect sizes in adolescents (Hedges g = −0.44) and youth with diagnosed depression (Hedges g = −0.75). Significant intervention-level moderators included physical activity frequency of 3 days per week and intervention duration less than 12 weeks. The physical activity programs were diverse, ranging from aerobic exercise on fitness equipment (ie, treadmills, stationary bikes, ellipticals) to running, swimming, dancing, playing sports, and playing exergames. A common theme was emphasis on aerobic dose (minutes of exercise at a given intensity). The findings are consistent with the adult literature, where bouts of moderate-intensity physical activity have been associated with improved outcomes for a transient period following the bout. 4 Cross-sectional data have suggested that the rate of depression among highly active adults is half that of sedentary adults, 5 and meta-analyses have suggested that physical activity programs are associated with moderate to large reductions in depressive symptoms. 6 The individual-level moderators identified make sense statistically, as teens and youth with depression may have higher baseline depressive symptoms (more room for improvement on the dependent variable) and lower levels of physical activity (more room for improvement on the independent variable). The finding that outcomes were less substantial when interventions