Perceived parental food controlling practices are related to obesogenic or leptogenic child lifestyle behaviors van Strien, T.; Niekerk, R.; Ouwens, Machteld
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research -You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain -You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal
Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Obesity has a substantial genetic component, but its increasing prevalence, also in young children, in a relatively short time must be attributed to environmental and psychological factors, possibly in interaction with metabolic and genetic susceptibilities. The present environment has been designated as obesogenic (Swinburn, Egger, & Raza, 1999), defined as ''the sum of influences that the surroundings, opportunities, or conditions of life have on promoting obesity in individuals or populations''. The opposite of an obesogenic environment is the ''leptogenic'' environment (leptos is Greek for thin). In such an environment, healthy food choices are promoted and physical activity is encouraged (Swinburn et al., 1999).Also the home food environment can be obesogenic or leptogenic. Home food environment may even be one of the most influential environments for the development of eating patterns and obesity in children (Rosenkranz & Dzewaltowski, 2008). At its micro-level, parents have an important controlling role, for example by providing the emotional context of the parent-child relationship, or whether they are permissive or firm. This may result in permissive (not firm), authoritarian (firm but not warm), or authoritative (firm and warm) parenting styles (Baumrind, 1971). Parents may also exercise control within more specific domains, for example food intake, by exercising pressure or restriction to eat. Both food controlling practices have been characterized as authoritarian, because the attempts to control the child's eating are associated with little regard for the child's own choices and preferences (Patrick, Nicklas, Hughes, & Morales, 2005). An (unintended) side effect of these parental food controlling practices may be that a child's good ability to use its own hunger and satiety cues to initiate and terminate eating is diminished (Carper, Fisher, & Birch, 2000). These practices are therefore considered risk factors for overeating and overweight (Ventura & Birch, 2008), though this has not always been supported in research (Carper et al., 2000, see Fig. 3;Farrow & Blisset, ...