2019
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Activity, Fatty Liver, and Glucose Metabolism Over the Life Course: The Lifelines Cohort

Abstract: Specific author contributions: Oyuntugs Byambasukh analyzed the data, designed the study's analytic strategy, and interpreted the results. Dorien Zelle contributed to the hypothesis and edited the manuscript. Eva Corpeleijn planned and designed the study, analyzed the data, directed its implementation, and reviewed the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this RTR population, MVPA levels were lower than those within the general population. In our study, 38% of RTRs were inactive (no-MVPA), whereas in the Lifelines cohort, a population-based study for which the same questionnaire (SQUASH) and comparable data processing methods were used, the prevalence of inactivity (no-MVPA) was 10% (n = 125,402, 40.5% males, median age of 45) [30,49]. Even in different age groups and gender, it was lower, ranging between 7.5% (n = 42,661, 40% of males, median age of 40) and 12.5% (n = 34,506, 45.6% of males, median age of 56) in the Lifelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within this RTR population, MVPA levels were lower than those within the general population. In our study, 38% of RTRs were inactive (no-MVPA), whereas in the Lifelines cohort, a population-based study for which the same questionnaire (SQUASH) and comparable data processing methods were used, the prevalence of inactivity (no-MVPA) was 10% (n = 125,402, 40.5% males, median age of 45) [30,49]. Even in different age groups and gender, it was lower, ranging between 7.5% (n = 42,661, 40% of males, median age of 40) and 12.5% (n = 34,506, 45.6% of males, median age of 56) in the Lifelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A growing body of evidence is showing that occupational MVPA may have no clear benefit on health in the general population [20][21][22]30,49]. This was tested in our study including a specific patient population, the RTR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, regarding the dose‐effect relationship of sport participation, research has been ambiguous 41 . While some studies 22,42 find positive dose‐response associations for PA in general, others show no dose effects 16 or even negative effects for very high volumes of PA 15 . Fifth, we do not control for several unavailable potential confounding variables, such as DNA or diseases that may influence the health outcomes (mortality in particular).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is not clear whether all types of activities can contribute to the recommended amount of daily PA as there is emerging evidence that occupational moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) may not have the same level of health bene ts as do physical activities conducted at leisure-time. [24] [25] [26][27] "As mentioned above, since it is not clear in previous studies whether the effects of MVPA prevent weight gain depending on whether it is more moderate or vigorous intensity activities, the primary objective of our study is to determine whether the association of MVPA on body weight gain are more dependent on moderate and vigorous physical activities. In case that the association of MVPA depends on its intensity, we explored how it relates to the types of activities reported by the participants."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%