Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight

Abstract

Background The global prevalence of childhood and adolescent obesity is high. Lifestyle changes towards a healthy diet, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary activities are recommended to prevent and treat obesity. Evidence suggests that changing these health behaviours can benefit cognitive function and school achievement in children and adolescents in general. There are various theoretical mechanisms that suggest that children and adolescents with excessive body fat may benefit particularly from these interventions. Objectives To assess whether lifestyle interventions (in the areas of diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and behavioural therapy) improve school achievement, cognitive function (e.g. executive functions) and/or future success in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight, compared with standard care, waiting‐list control, no treatment, or an attention placebo control group. Search methods In February 2017, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and 15 other databases. We also searched two trials registries, reference lists, and handsearched one journal from inception. We also contacted researchers in the field to obtain unpublished data. Selection criteria We included randomised and quasi‐randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of behavioural interventions for weight management in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight. We excluded studies in children and adolescents with medical conditions known to affect weight status, school achievement and cognitive function. We also excluded self‐ and parent‐reported outcomes. Data collection and analysis Four review authors independently selected studies for inclusion. Two review authors extracted data, assessed quality and risks of bias, and evaluated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted study authors to obtain additional information. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Where the same outcome was assessed across different intervention types, we reported standardised effect sizes for findings from single‐study and multiple‐study analyses to allow comparison of intervention effects across intervention types. To ease interpretation of the effect size, we also reported the mean difference of effect sizes for single‐study outcomes. Main results We included 18 studies (59 records) of 2384 children and adolescents with obesity or overweight. Eight studies delivered physical activity interventions, seven studies combined physical activity programmes with healthy lifestyle education, and three studies delivered dietary interventions. We included five RCTs and 13 cluster‐RCTs. The studies took place in 10 different countries. Two were carried out in children attending preschool, 11 were conducted in primary/elementary school‐aged children, four studies were aimed at adolescents attending secondary/high s...

Scaling‐up evidence‐based obesity interventions: A systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale‐up penalty

“…Firstly, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) electronic databases were searched. Search terms to identify scaled‐up interventions were developed on the basis of terminology used in reviews by Milat et al Reis et al and Ben Charif et al and combined with published search filters for physical activity/sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and obesity . Search terms are described in detail in Supplement File S1.…”

Effects of active video games on children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

“…25 We adopted this approach in accordance with a previous review instead of including any non-randomized trial. 26 AVGs were defined as any computer game using interaction between body movements and specific feedback and goals. Therefore, interventions which included consoles, such as the Nintendo Wii, Playstation (Sony Computer Entertainment Inc), and Kinect TM for Microsoft's Xbox 360TM (Microsoft Inc), and game controllers, such as GameCycle (Three Rivers Holdings) and Sony EyeToyVR (Sony Computer Entertainment Inc), were considered eligible.…”

Cognitive function of young male tennis players and non-athletes

“…The research of Kutlík and Čelko (2013) has shown a statistically significant impact of physical activity on the cognitive functions of children in testing that was targeted on memory, attention and executive functions. Martin et al (2018) have also reported reliable evidence for improving cognitive executive function by physical activity-only interventions. We can assume that the reason for such findings is that executive functions, which are also cognitive functions, have been found to be more sensitive to physical activity than other types of cognitive functions (Best, 2010).…”