2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Activity Behavior During and After COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders—A Longitudinal Study in the Austrian, German, and Italian Alps

Abstract: BackgroundIn Alpine regions, which are very similar due to their topographical location and their wide-ranging sports offerings, the restrictions on sports activities during the COVID-19 pandemic differed in type and level: while in some regions (Tyrol, South Tyrol, Trentino), all sports activities were forbidden except for walking near the home, in other regions (Upper Bavaria, Vorarlberg), people were allowed to go hiking and running during the first lockdown.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(140 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in Norway, no restrictions were set on access of parks and other natural environments. All of this is in line with a recent analysis by Schöttl et al ( 22 ), which indicated that the impact of the lockdown measures on people's physical activity levels tended to be less pronounced where people had the possibility to visit natural environments. These findings highlight the paramount importance of natural environments as an arena for the promotion of health-enhancing physical activity in the population, and corroborate the value of investing in policies that grant and facilitate the access to them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, in Norway, no restrictions were set on access of parks and other natural environments. All of this is in line with a recent analysis by Schöttl et al ( 22 ), which indicated that the impact of the lockdown measures on people's physical activity levels tended to be less pronounced where people had the possibility to visit natural environments. These findings highlight the paramount importance of natural environments as an arena for the promotion of health-enhancing physical activity in the population, and corroborate the value of investing in policies that grant and facilitate the access to them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown by a study examining longitudinal data among residents of five alpine regions, the mobility restrictions associated with the COVID-19 lockdowns generally had a negative impact on people's physical activity and exercise habits. However, this impact was less pronounced where people had the possibility to visit natural environments ( 22 ). This finding is supported by studies showing increased outdoor recreational activity during the lockdown compared to pre-lockdown periods among Strava users, with an increased use of urban green spaces, forests, and protected areas ( 23 , 24 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research topics addressed in this study were an optional part of a large-scale retrospective online survey examining changes in physical activity, health and lifestyle behaviors due to COVID-19 ( 15 ). Data collection was conducted from December 12, 2020, to January 31, 2021, after a pre-test period, using SoSci Survey online survey software ( https://www.soscisurvey.de/ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and compulsory part of the online questionnaire included socio-demographic data (e.g., gender, age, education), mental health status (K6 scale), lifestyle (e.g., leisure time, sleep duration, screen time) and physical activity (Eurobarometer 472 study) behaviors as well as questions about the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., COVID-19 risk group, COVID-19 concerns, satisfaction with COVID-19 crisis management). For details on the measures of the first part of the questionnaire, please see Schöttl et al ( 15 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation