2004
DOI: 10.3989/tp.2004.v61.i2.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical activity according to sex in the argar culture. An approach based on the human remains

Abstract: RESUMENSe estudian restos humanos procedentes de yacimientos de la Cultura de El Argar con el objetivo de ampliar el conocimiento sobre la actividad física llevada a cabo por los individuos. Se analizan tres tipos de marcadores: la artrosis, los marcadores de estrés músculo-esquelético y los traumatismos. Los resultados obtenidos son coincidentes con el entorno y los terrenos en los que se ubicaron los asentamientos argáricos y señalan una clara diferencia entre sexos. Aunque es imposible determinar la "profes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EC have become the dominant method for studying activity due to the perception that they record specific muscle use, that recording them involves low levels of intra‐observer and inter‐observer error (Hawkey & Merbs, ), and the apparent idea that they do not have a multi‐factorial aetiology. This has led to their use to study many aspects (often more than one in each study) of life in the past, for example, the effect of subsistence strategy changes or differences (Hawkey, ; Churchill & Morris, ; Steen & Lane, ; Eshed et al , ; Papathanasiou, ; Clapper, ; Doying, ; Villotte et al , ; Stefanovic & Porcic, ), cultural changes or differences (Chapman, ; Al‐Oumaoui et al , ; Groves, ; Lieverse et al , ; Zabecki, ; Lieverse et al , ; Rojas‐Sepúlveda et al , ; Shuler et al , ), tool use, specific or habitual activities (Lai & Lovell, ; Peterson, ; Whittle et al , ; Lovell & Dublenko, ; Lukacs & Pal, ; Jordana et al , ; Molnar, ; Cope, ; Weiss, ; Molnar, ; Üstündağ & Deveci, ), sexual differences in labour (Jiménez‐Brobeil et al , ; Perry, ; Rodrigues, ; Aranda et al , ; Hagaman, ; Peterson, ), occupational differences (Villotte et al , ; Milella et al , ), social stratification (Rodrigues, ; Porčić & Stefanović, ; Havelková et al , ; Palmer, ) and disability (Hawkey, ). They have also been analysed in early hominids and non‐human primates (Belcastro et al , ; Drapeau, ; Cashmore, ; Mariotti & Belcastro, ) as well as other mammals (Bendrey, ).…”
Section: Entheseal Changes: Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC have become the dominant method for studying activity due to the perception that they record specific muscle use, that recording them involves low levels of intra‐observer and inter‐observer error (Hawkey & Merbs, ), and the apparent idea that they do not have a multi‐factorial aetiology. This has led to their use to study many aspects (often more than one in each study) of life in the past, for example, the effect of subsistence strategy changes or differences (Hawkey, ; Churchill & Morris, ; Steen & Lane, ; Eshed et al , ; Papathanasiou, ; Clapper, ; Doying, ; Villotte et al , ; Stefanovic & Porcic, ), cultural changes or differences (Chapman, ; Al‐Oumaoui et al , ; Groves, ; Lieverse et al , ; Zabecki, ; Lieverse et al , ; Rojas‐Sepúlveda et al , ; Shuler et al , ), tool use, specific or habitual activities (Lai & Lovell, ; Peterson, ; Whittle et al , ; Lovell & Dublenko, ; Lukacs & Pal, ; Jordana et al , ; Molnar, ; Cope, ; Weiss, ; Molnar, ; Üstündağ & Deveci, ), sexual differences in labour (Jiménez‐Brobeil et al , ; Perry, ; Rodrigues, ; Aranda et al , ; Hagaman, ; Peterson, ), occupational differences (Villotte et al , ; Milella et al , ), social stratification (Rodrigues, ; Porčić & Stefanović, ; Havelková et al , ; Palmer, ) and disability (Hawkey, ). They have also been analysed in early hominids and non‐human primates (Belcastro et al , ; Drapeau, ; Cashmore, ; Mariotti & Belcastro, ) as well as other mammals (Bendrey, ).…”
Section: Entheseal Changes: Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las prácticas funerarias han ocupado un lugar central en la investigación del grupo argárico (Siret y Siret, 1890;Chapman, 1981;Lull, 1983;Lull et al, 2016;Jover y López, 1997;Cámara, 2001). Entre otros, se han abordado aspectos como la tipología y distribución de las sepulturas en los asentamientos, la antropología física, las dietas y patologías óseas de los individuos inhumados (Botella et al, 1995;Jiménez-Brobeil et al, 2004;2009;Molina et al, 2019;Knipper et al, 2020), así como marcadores de movilidad (Díaz-Zorita et al, 2012), disposición de los cadáveres en las sepulturas o la tipología, variedad, singularidad y distribución de los ajuares en las tumbas (Aranda y Esquivel, 2006;Aranda y Montón, 2011;Andúgar et al, 2021;Lull et al, 2017;Bonora, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified