2012
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e318254c7e5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physeal Fractures of the Distal Tibia and Fibula (Salter-Harris Type I, II, III, and IV Fractures)

Abstract: Physeal fractures of the distal tibia and fibula are common and can be seen at any age, although most are seen in the adolescent. An understanding of the unique anatomy of the skeletally immature ankle in relation to the mechanism of injury will help one understand the injury patterns seen in this population. A thorough clinical exam is critical to the diagnosis and treatment of these injuries and the avoidance of potentially catastrophic complications. Nondisplaced physeal fractures of the distal tibia and fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A clinically presumed SH1DF presented with all of the following criteria: (1) limited weight bearing, (2) tenderness and swelling over the lateral aspect of the distal fibula at the level of the physis, and (3) 3 radiographic views of the ankle demonstrating open physes and the absence of a fracture. [5][6][7][8] Excluded were children with injuries greater than 3 days old, preexisting musculoskeletal or coagulopathic disease, developmental delay, history of ankle fracture within 3 months, and families with an insurmountable language barrier and/or no telephone access. The study was approved by the human ethics review boards at the Hospital for Sick Children and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinically presumed SH1DF presented with all of the following criteria: (1) limited weight bearing, (2) tenderness and swelling over the lateral aspect of the distal fibula at the level of the physis, and (3) 3 radiographic views of the ankle demonstrating open physes and the absence of a fracture. [5][6][7][8] Excluded were children with injuries greater than 3 days old, preexisting musculoskeletal or coagulopathic disease, developmental delay, history of ankle fracture within 3 months, and families with an insurmountable language barrier and/or no telephone access. The study was approved by the human ethics review boards at the Hospital for Sick Children and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous screws have been used for the fixation of epiphyseal ankle fractures in many studies in the literature (Podeszwa et al 2008; Castellani et al 2009; Sankar et al 2013; Charlton et al 2005; Podeszwa and Mubarak 2012). Lintecum and Blaiser have reported good clinical results after using percutaneous cannulated screws (Lintecum and Blasier 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, SalterHarris fractures may lead to physeal bars, especially those that are higher grade. When physeal bars are eccentrically located in the tibia, varus or valgus deformity of the ankle may result, whereas central physeal bars may lead to restricted growth without angular deformity [ 7 ].…”
Section: Fractures About the Anklementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tibial fractures accompany approximately 25 % of fi bular fractures [ 7 ], so if there is a fi bular fracture the tibia should be closely examined.…”
Section: Fractures About the Anklementioning
confidence: 99%