Phylomemetic Patterns in Science Evolution—The Rise and Fall of Scientific Fields

Abstract

We introduce an automated method for the bottom-up reconstruction of the cognitive evolution of science, based on big-data issued from digital libraries, and modeled as lineage relationships between scientific fields. We refer to these dynamic structures as phylomemetic networks or phylomemies, by analogy with biological evolution; and we show that they exhibit strong regularities, with clearly identifiable phylomemetic patterns. Some structural properties of the scientific fields - in particular their density -, which are defined independently of the phylomemy reconstruction, are clearly correlated with their status and their fate in the phylomemy (like their age or their short term survival). Within the framework of a quantitative epistemology, this approach raises the question of predictibility for science evolution, and sketches a prototypical life cycle of the scientific fields: an increase of their cohesion after their emergence, the renewal of their conceptual background through branching or merging events, before decaying when their density is getting too low.

Lexical shifts, substantive changes, and continuity in State of the Union discourse, 1790–2014

“…32. Growth in this area makes us optimistic that the approach developed here can be applied widely in the analysis of other corpora where change in terms' use over time is substantial, has multiple sources, and has uncertain bearing for higher-level meaning.…”

How are topics born? Understanding the research dynamics preceding the emergence of new areas

“…For example, Chavalarias & Cointet (2013) used CorText Manager to extract a list of 2000 n-grams representing the most salient terms from a corpus and derived a co-occurrence matrix on which they performed clustering analysis to discover patterns in the evolution of science Jo, Lagoze & Giles (2007) developed an approach that correlates the distribution of terms extracted from a text with the distribution of the citation graphs related to publications containing these terms. Their work assumes that if a term is relevant to a topic, documents containing that term will have a stronger connection than randomly selected ones.…”

Visions de la complexité. Le démon de Laplace dans tous ses états

“…Internet fournit aussi des traces accessibles de nombreuses activités, comme la recherche par exemple. Les données de publications accessibles dans de très grandes bases de données permettent de cartographier l'évolution de l'utilisation de différents termes, les collaborations, les citations (Chavalarias et Cointet, 2013 ;Grauwin et al, 2012). Ces recherches permettent aussi d'étudier la structure de grands réseaux d'interactions à partir de données et de les confronter à des travaux théoriques.…”