2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeography of the ectomycorrhizal Pisolithus species as inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences

Abstract: Summary• The fungal genus Pisolithus is cosmopolitan in warm temperate regions and forms ectomycorrhizal associations with a wide range of woody plants. To delimit phylogenetic Pisolithus species and identify their geographical distribution, 102 collections were made worldwide and their rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was sequenced.• Phylogenetic analyses of these sequences, together with 46 additional GenBank accessions, identified 11 species.• A strong phylogeographical pattern was observed related to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
144
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The structures were similar to the phylogenetic cladogram in Martin et al (2002). The sequences of all isolates used in this study were distributed in clades 1 and 2, with strong bootstrap support (99 %) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The structures were similar to the phylogenetic cladogram in Martin et al (2002). The sequences of all isolates used in this study were distributed in clades 1 and 2, with strong bootstrap support (99 %) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…One group included the isolates VIC 30593, VIC 30598, VIC 30599, VIC 30602, VIC 30604, and VIC 30606, together with PT90A and RS26, also from Brazil (Figure 2, Tables 1 and 2), and was identified as Pisolithus microcarpus (Martin et al, 2002). The other group that included MU98/2 and MU98/12, was identified as Pisolithus albus, native to Australia (Martin et al, 2002) (Table 2, Figure 2). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations