2006
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2006)99[697:portir]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeography of <I>Reticulitermes</I> Termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in California Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consensus tree used four Markov chains run at 10 6 generations with a burn-in of 2 x 10 4 . Parsimony bootstrap analysis and maximum likelihood analysis was by the method of Tripodi et al (2006) (Felsenstein 1985), and genealogical relationships among mtDNA haplotypes were constructed using TCS (Clement et al 2000) with the method described by Templeton et al (1992). Briefly, PAUP* 4.0b10 was used for maximum likelihood and unweighted parsimony analysis on the alignments, the Branch and Bound algorithm of PAUP* was used for parsimony bootstrap analysis, and a heuristic search used the neighbor-joining tree as the starting tree with PAUP*.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus tree used four Markov chains run at 10 6 generations with a burn-in of 2 x 10 4 . Parsimony bootstrap analysis and maximum likelihood analysis was by the method of Tripodi et al (2006) (Felsenstein 1985), and genealogical relationships among mtDNA haplotypes were constructed using TCS (Clement et al 2000) with the method described by Templeton et al (1992). Briefly, PAUP* 4.0b10 was used for maximum likelihood and unweighted parsimony analysis on the alignments, the Branch and Bound algorithm of PAUP* was used for parsimony bootstrap analysis, and a heuristic search used the neighbor-joining tree as the starting tree with PAUP*.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.). Portions of the data and the sampling methodology for the NTS have been published previously (Messenger et al, 2002;Austin et al, 2005Austin et al, , 2006Austin et al, , 2007Szalanski et al, 2006;Tripodi et al, 2006;McKern et al, 2007). Here, NTS city locations for Reticulitermes flavipes, R. virginicus and Coptotermes formosanus (n = 771) were batch digitised for georeferencing (GPS Visualizer, 2013) and 10% individually verified for accuracy (data are available in Table S2, File S1).…”
Section: Regional Biogeography and Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create the consensus tree, four Markov chains ran for 10 6 generations. Parsimony boostrap analysis (Felsenstein 1985) and maximum likelihood analysis was conducted with the method by Tripodi et al (2006), and genealogical relationships among mtDNA haplotypes were constructed using TCS (Clement et al 2000) with the method described by Templeton et al (1992). Once the consensus tree was constructed, PAUP* 4.0b10 was used to conduct maximum likelihood and unweighted parsimony analysis on the alignments, the Branch and Bound algorithm of PAUP* was used for parsimony bootstrap analysis, and a heuristic search was performed using the neighbor joining tree as the starting tree with PAUP*.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%