2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03097.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeography and mitochondrial diversity of extirpated brown bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the contiguous United States and Mexico

Abstract: The fossil record indicates that the brown bear (Ursus arctos) colonized North America from Asia over 50 000 years ago. The species historically occupied the western United States and northern Mexico but has been extirpated from over 99% of this range in the last two centuries. To evaluate colonization hypotheses, subspecific classifications, and historical patterns and levels of genetic diversity in this region, we sequenced 229 nucleotides of the mitochondrial DNA control region in 108 museum specimens. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
76
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved laboratory methods led to the use of nuclear DNA (nDNA) sequences in the early 2000s (Li et al, 2000; Vallianatos et al, 2002; de la Herrán et al, 2004), and the number of studies using multiple loci has increased since then. Research using many museum samples (> 100) has also become more common (e.g., Godoy et al, 2004; Miller et al, 2006). Polymerase chain reaction-based studies of natural history collections, however, still almost always use fewer than 20 loci and commonly use just one, especially when working with relatively large sample sizes.…”
Section: The Use Of Museum Specimens In Evolutionary Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved laboratory methods led to the use of nuclear DNA (nDNA) sequences in the early 2000s (Li et al, 2000; Vallianatos et al, 2002; de la Herrán et al, 2004), and the number of studies using multiple loci has increased since then. Research using many museum samples (> 100) has also become more common (e.g., Godoy et al, 2004; Miller et al, 2006). Polymerase chain reaction-based studies of natural history collections, however, still almost always use fewer than 20 loci and commonly use just one, especially when working with relatively large sample sizes.…”
Section: The Use Of Museum Specimens In Evolutionary Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taberlet and Bouvet (1994) identified two highly divergent lineages which on average differed by more than 7%. The western lineage is found in Spain, the Pyrenees, Norway, southern Sweden, Italy (Alps and Apennines), Romania and the Balkans whereas the eastern lineage occurs in Slovakia, Estonia, Romania, Russia, Finland, northern Sweden and also in the Russian Far East, Japan and parts of northwestern North America (Taberlet and Bouvet 1994;Taberlet et al 1995;Miller et al 2006;Saarma et al 2007). The two lineages probably correspond to different glacial refugia during the earlier Quaternary (Taberlet and Bouvet 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Secondly, the mitochondrial estimates for the MRCA of brown and polar bears may have been underestimated because several geographically isolated populations of U. arctos were not included in molecular dating analyses. Indeed, divergent mtDNA haplotypes have been detected in short D-loop or cytochrome b sequences of brown bears currently found in Iran, Pakistan, and Mongolia (Gobi Desert), as well as in extinct populations of North Africa [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: When Did Polar and Brown Bears Split?mentioning
confidence: 99%