2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeographic analysis delimits three evolutionary significant units of least chipmunks in North America and identifies unique genetic diversity within the imperiled Peñasco population

Abstract: Although least chipmunks (Neotamias minimus) are a widely distributed North American species of least concern, the southernmost population, N. m. atristriatus (Peñasco least chipmunk), is imperiled and a candidate for federal listing as a subspecies. We conducted a phylogeographic analysis across the N. minimus range to assess genomic differentiation and distinctiveness of the N. m. atristriatus population. Additionally, we leveraged the historical component of sampling to conduct a temporal analysis of N. min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the clustering analyses, nuclear phylogenomic tree, and mitogenome haplotype network unequivocally grouped N. m. atristriatus with N. m operarius and N. m. caryi in the southern clade"; and 2) "Neither mitochondrial nor nuclear datasets identified reciprocally monophyletic diversity between N. m. atristriatus and the geographically proximate N. m. operarius and N. m. caryi" (Puckett et al, 2021, p. 10;13; emphases added by us). We refute the interpretation, principal conclusions, and taxonomic recommendations of Puckett et al (2021;as outlined above). In this paper we identify four broad conceptual issues that led to errant recommendations: (1) interpretation of subspecies and diagnosability, (2) inappropriate use of reciprocal monophyly as a criterion for subspecies, (3) importance of geographic isolation, and (4) error in hypothesis testing and misinterpretation of results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…the clustering analyses, nuclear phylogenomic tree, and mitogenome haplotype network unequivocally grouped N. m. atristriatus with N. m operarius and N. m. caryi in the southern clade"; and 2) "Neither mitochondrial nor nuclear datasets identified reciprocally monophyletic diversity between N. m. atristriatus and the geographically proximate N. m. operarius and N. m. caryi" (Puckett et al, 2021, p. 10;13; emphases added by us). We refute the interpretation, principal conclusions, and taxonomic recommendations of Puckett et al (2021;as outlined above). In this paper we identify four broad conceptual issues that led to errant recommendations: (1) interpretation of subspecies and diagnosability, (2) inappropriate use of reciprocal monophyly as a criterion for subspecies, (3) importance of geographic isolation, and (4) error in hypothesis testing and misinterpretation of results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This will necessitate an improvement in how scientists translate technical jargon for knowledge-users, and will ensure that the scientific interpretation of results accurately reflects the limitations of the genomic data or analyses. As an example of these persistent issues, we discuss the results, interpretation and conservation-related recommendations from a recently published phylogenomic study of chipmunks, which bear on a pending decision of U.S. federal protections under the Endangered Species Act (ESA; Puckett et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations