2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): Molecules, morphology and the Great American Interchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
99
2
21

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
7
99
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…5b and Baskin 1989Baskin , 2004Decker and Wozencraft 1991;Ahrens 2012). However, molecular data analyses (Koepfli et al 2007;Eizirik et al 2010) have contested the groupings obtained with morphological data alone by considering that morphology-based assessments reflect convergences associated with similar lifestyles and diets rather than ancestry. These inconsistencies provide a debatable scenario while further studies hopefully provide better evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5b and Baskin 1989Baskin , 2004Decker and Wozencraft 1991;Ahrens 2012). However, molecular data analyses (Koepfli et al 2007;Eizirik et al 2010) have contested the groupings obtained with morphological data alone by considering that morphology-based assessments reflect convergences associated with similar lifestyles and diets rather than ancestry. These inconsistencies provide a debatable scenario while further studies hopefully provide better evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors resulted in a second wave of procyonid migration long after the full closure of the Panama isthmus, as physical connection between the Americas was present at ca 3 Ma. However, molecular studies have demonstrated that the diversification leading to the extant Procyonidae occurred in the early Miocene (∼20 Ma), while the divergence times between coatis and raccoons occurred in the late Miocene (∼8-7 and 5.7-5 Ma, respectively) (Koepfli et al 2007;Eizirik et al 2010) well before the full closure of the Panama isthmus. This scenario requires a clear bias in the fossil record, long ghost lineages, and an evolutionary history of the living taxa that precedes the GABI.…”
Section: Procyonids and The Great American Biotic Interchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bayesian inference (BI) was performed in MRBAYES3.2.1 [57], 1,000,000 steps of the MCMC algorithm (with trees sampled every 100 generations), and the posterior probabilities were calculated discarding 25 percent of the initial iterations as burn-in, after the stabilization of log-likelihood values. The phylogenetic trees were rooted using the cyt-b haplotype of Nasua nasua as outgroup, since this is the sister species of N. narica that inhabits South America [33].…”
Section: Phylogeographic Analysis Based On Mtdnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic markers have been used in populations of procyonids for studies of analysis of relatedness [27]- [32], phylogeogra-phy [17] [33] [34] [35], and even taxonomic boundaries [36]. However, genetic markers, even widely used microsatellites, have not been employed to describe the variability and genetic structure of different N. narica populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete phylogenetic analysis must take into account the now-vast amount of information embodied in molecular studies. Moreover, as noted, for example by Koepfli et al (2007), disagreement with prior fossil and morphology-based assessments often is accounted for by morphological similarities reflecting adaptive convergence rather than ancestry. Further, incongruence between the molecular and morphological datasets may be due to non-independence among developmentally and genetically correlated atomized morphological characters (e.g., Rosenberger, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%