2013
DOI: 10.1071/is13006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the ophrynopine clade revisited: review of the parasitoid sawfly genera Ophrella Middlekauff, Ophrynopus Konow and Stirocorsia Konow (Hymenoptera : Orussidae)

Abstract: The rare family Orussidae comprises the only parasitoid sawflies and are sister to the Apocrita, the latter comprising most of Hymenoptera. Because of this, their morphology and relationships have been particularly important for interpreting the morphology of and biological transitions within the order as a whole. Within the Orussidae the ophrynopines are a comparatively diverse clade with a predominantly southern hemisphere distribution. Here, a revised and expanded morphological dataset incorporating several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4C), and the position of the fore wing vein cu-a on Cu1 some distance from vein M ( Figs 4A, 6C); all these characters are unique within the ophrynopine clade. Previously diagnostic features suggested for Ophrella, e.g., the presence of flattened, leaf-shaped setae (Middlekauff 1985) and the presence of only one hind tibial apical spur (Vilhelmsen et al 2013) are not observed in O. seagi and cannot be upheld as potential autapomorphies for Ophrella. Nevertheless, the monophyly of the genus, including O. seagi, is well supported, and it is still possible to identify O. seagi correctly to Ophrella in the genus key in Vilhelmsen et al (2013).…”
Section: Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4C), and the position of the fore wing vein cu-a on Cu1 some distance from vein M ( Figs 4A, 6C); all these characters are unique within the ophrynopine clade. Previously diagnostic features suggested for Ophrella, e.g., the presence of flattened, leaf-shaped setae (Middlekauff 1985) and the presence of only one hind tibial apical spur (Vilhelmsen et al 2013) are not observed in O. seagi and cannot be upheld as potential autapomorphies for Ophrella. Nevertheless, the monophyly of the genus, including O. seagi, is well supported, and it is still possible to identify O. seagi correctly to Ophrella in the genus key in Vilhelmsen et al (2013).…”
Section: Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vilhelmsen (2003) in his cladistic treatment of the Orussidae confirmed this and added the presence of a longitudinal furrow on top of the head separating the posteriormost coronal teeth as further support for the monophyly of Ophrella. Vilhelmsen et al (2013) cited the presence of only a single short hind tibial apical spur as additional corroboration for the monophyly of Ophrella.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations