2001
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of Limia (Teleostei: Poeciliidae) Based on NADH Dehydrogenase Subunit 2 Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also provide support for a sister-group relationship between Micropoecilia and Acanthophacelus and corroborate previous morphological (Lucinda and Reis, 2005) and molecular (Breden et al, 1999;Hamilton, 2001;Hrbek et al, 2007) studies that have supported this hypothesis. In addition, our results confirm Poeser et al's (2005) hypothesis that Poecilia wingei, which was described after Rosen and Bailey's (1963) publication, is the sister taxon to Poecilia reticulata.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results also provide support for a sister-group relationship between Micropoecilia and Acanthophacelus and corroborate previous morphological (Lucinda and Reis, 2005) and molecular (Breden et al, 1999;Hamilton, 2001;Hrbek et al, 2007) studies that have supported this hypothesis. In addition, our results confirm Poeser et al's (2005) hypothesis that Poecilia wingei, which was described after Rosen and Bailey's (1963) publication, is the sister taxon to Poecilia reticulata.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, our results are consistent with a clade comprising Limia, Mollienesia, and Pamphorichthys as in Hamilton (2001) and Hrbek et al (2007). However, we interpret this result with caution given our incomplete taxonomic sampling for these lineages.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors addressed the relationships of smaller groups of the Poeciliinae (e.g. Rosen, 1979;Rauchenberger, 1989;Rosa & Costa, 1993;Rauchenberger et al, 1990;Meyer et al, 1994;Mojica et al, 1997;Rodriguez, 1997;Ptaceck & Breden, 1998;Marcus & McCune, 1999;Breden et al, 1999;Hamilton, 2001;Mateos et al, 2002;Poeser, 2003;Kallmann et al, 2004), whereas others coped with higher taxa (Parenti, 1981;Meyer & Lydeard, 1993;Costa, 1996Costa, , 1998Ghedotti, 2000). However, no phylogenetic study has simultaneously analyzed the relationships among representatives of all poeciliine genera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available phylogenetic hypotheses, whether molecular or morphological, have concentrated on single genera or subgenera (Rosen, 1979;Rauchenberger, 1989;Rauchenberger et al, 1990;Meyer et al, 1994;Lydeard et al, 1995;Mojica et al, 1997;Rodriguez, 1997;Ptacek and Breden, 1998;Hamilton, 2001;Mateos et al, 2002;Lucinda and Reis, 2005), or have investigated a limited number of poeciliid fishes within the context of higher level phylogenetic relationships (Ghedotti, 2000). The implicit phylogenetic hypothesis (Parenti and Rauchenberger, 1989) and Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%