2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of leafcutter ants in the genus Atta Fabricius (Formicidae: Attini) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
71
3
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
71
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…insularis and At. texana [49], we find no evidence for significant genetic differentiation between Attamyces from At. insularis and some Attamyces from At.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…insularis and At. texana [49], we find no evidence for significant genetic differentiation between Attamyces from At. insularis and some Attamyces from At.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…insularis occurs only in Cuba but not on mainland North America, and because At. insularis is significantly derived at both the molecular and morphological levels from the mainland Atta lineages ( [49], suggesting significant evolutionary time to permit divergence of At. insularis), it seems unlikely that the current genetic similarity between mainland and Cuban Attamyces was maintained during the divergence process of At.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Atta contains 15 highly polymorphic species, actually subdivided into the four following monophyletic groups, Atta s. str., Archeatta, Neoatta and Epiatta , a subdivision that slightly differs from a previous taxonomical division [Borgmeier, 1959;Bacci et al, 2009]. Our study covered species of all subgenera, and in all of the 15 investigated species we found an MG.…”
Section: The Macroglomerulusmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These results are possibly related to the recent evolutionary history of the two species. The genus Atta is monophyletic (Bacci et al, 2009), with relatively recent adaptive radiation about 8 to 13 million years ago (Brady et al, 2006). However, the identification of adaptive radiation is based on the phylogenetic relationships of species and not on the dating of known fossils of Atta, which are scarce for the genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%