2004
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.629.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of infraorder Sejina (Acari: Mesostigmata)

Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships among the families in the infraorder Sejina and the position of Sejina relative to other infraorders of Mesostigmata are re-examined based on molecular and morphological data. Data sets included DNA sequence data for complete 18S, EF-1 , partial CO1genes, and 69 morphological characters. The two families of Heterozerconina consistently group within Sejina, and we propose to synonymize Heterozerconina with Sejina (Sejina s.l). Microgyniina is not the closest relative of Sejina. Rather… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria for marker selection were: (a) easy amplification and well established protocols; (b) informative at this taxonomic level (mitochondrial markers generally evolve too fast). Markers selected included 18S rRNA (≈1800 bp), the most commonly used marker at this taxonomic level (Black et al 1997;Dobson and Barker 1999;Klompen et al 2007), two segments of 28S rRNA representing the D3-D5 and D9-D10 variable regions (total ≈1200 bp) (Klompen et al 2007), and partial sequences of Elongation factor 1-α (EF-1α); ≈1100bp) (Klompen 2000a;Lekveishvili and Klompen 2004). 18S sequences are available for all of these taxa, but the data set is far from complete for the two other loci (28S, EF-1α).…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Criteria for marker selection were: (a) easy amplification and well established protocols; (b) informative at this taxonomic level (mitochondrial markers generally evolve too fast). Markers selected included 18S rRNA (≈1800 bp), the most commonly used marker at this taxonomic level (Black et al 1997;Dobson and Barker 1999;Klompen et al 2007), two segments of 28S rRNA representing the D3-D5 and D9-D10 variable regions (total ≈1200 bp) (Klompen et al 2007), and partial sequences of Elongation factor 1-α (EF-1α); ≈1100bp) (Klompen 2000a;Lekveishvili and Klompen 2004). 18S sequences are available for all of these taxa, but the data set is far from complete for the two other loci (28S, EF-1α).…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction, amplification, and sequencing, followed procedures listed in Lekveishvili and Klompen (2004) and Klompen et al (2007). Alignment for EF-1α is relatively straightforward, although the segment considered included an intron of variable length.…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohort-level relationships are unresolved. Johnston in Norton et al (1993) suggested a sister-group relationship with the Trigynaspida, but Klompen (2000) and Lekveishvili & Klompen (2004) presented DNA evidence showing that the Heterozerconina are highly modified members of the cohort Sejina. Although these data are the best available evidence for classifying the Heterozerconina, Lindquist et al (2009) continued to treat the group as its own separate cohort pending further evidence regarding the placement of these two enigmatic families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, those of the Heterozerconidae are connected to the anterior wall of a deep groove, and thus are directed posterolaterally (Gerdeman & Alberti 2007). Although the two families are closely related (Lekveishvili & Klompen 2004), these markedly different suckers caused Domrow (1956) to speculate that they have arisen independently. The existence of an undescribed Heterozerconidae without suckers (Lindquist et al 2009;Klompen, pers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on its unusual suite of characteristics, and results of recently completed analyses of sejine phylogeny (Lekveishvili & Klompen, 2004;Lekveishvili & Klompen, in prep) we remove S. krantzi from Sejus and name it as the sole representative of a new genus, which we describe below. The male and immature stages will be described in a later paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%