“…These molecular approaches have been based primarily on the G+C content of chromosomal DNA (Davison et al, 1980), total DNA homology (Davison & Mackenzie, 1984), restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (Mochizuki et al, 1990(Mochizuki et al, , 1996, arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) (Liu et al, 2000), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis (Kac et al, 1999;Liu et al, 1997;Mochizuki et al, 1997) and PCR fingerprinting (Faggi et al, 2001;Graser et al, 1999b). More recently, sequence analysis of the rDNA regions (Graser et al, 1999a;Harmsen et al, 1995;Makimura et al, 1998Makimura et al, , 1999Mochizuki et al, 1999Mochizuki et al, , 2003 and, in particular, analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions (Graser et al, 1999a;Makimura et al, 1998Makimura et al, , 1999Mochizuki et al, 1999), which appeared more suitable than the gene coding for the small-subunit rRNA (18S rRNA) (Harmsen et al, 1995), were used successfully to evaluate the phylogenetic relationships within the T. mentagrophytes complex. These accurate molecular studies emerged as a critical issue for comprehensive understanding of the clinical and epidemiological implications of the genetic heterogeneity of T. mentagrophytes and resulted in the re-establishment of three if not four species: Trichophyton interdigitale close to the teleomorph Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii, T. mentagrophytes close to the teleomorph A. simii, and T. erinacei, plus another Trichophyon anamorph, both close to the teleomorph A. benhamiae, which includes both European-American and African races (Graser et al 1999b;Probst et al, 2002;Takahashi et al, 2003;Nenoff et al, 2007).…”