2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and intraspecific variation of the extreme xerophile, Xeromyces bisporus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2011) showed that M. eremophilus does not belong to Monascus , and appears to be related to Penicillium . In order to clarify the difference placements of M. eremophilus in literature, we re-analysed the LSU data set of Park & Jong (2003) and Vinnere-Pettersson et al. (2011) together with the data set generated in this study (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2011) showed that M. eremophilus does not belong to Monascus , and appears to be related to Penicillium . In order to clarify the difference placements of M. eremophilus in literature, we re-analysed the LSU data set of Park & Jong (2003) and Vinnere-Pettersson et al. (2011) together with the data set generated in this study (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that we did not observe any fertile cleistothecia may indicate that the type strain (FRR 3338) is deteriorating. Molecular data shows that this species is related to Penicillium (Park et al., 2004, Vinnere-Pettersson et al., 2011, Houbraken et al., 2014) and is transferred to Penicillium (this study).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The asexual morph of X. bisporus was described as Fraseriella bispora , type of the monotypic genus Fraseriella , thus these generic names are synonyms and compete for use. Although an early study suggested that Xeromyces bisporus belonged in Monascus (Stchigel et al 2004), a more extensive account has shown that Xeromyces is a distinct genus within Eurotiales (Pettersson et al 2011). Xeromyces has priority and is used more extensively than Fraseriella , thus we recommend the use of Xeromyces .…”
Section: Eurotialesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, numerous D1/D2 sequences, corresponding to different classes, orders and families of ascomycetes retrieved from GenBank or NITE/NRBC databases were included in the phylogenetic study (Table 1). Most of these sequences were published by different authors (Sugiyama et al 1999, Sugiyama & Mikawa 2001, Untereiner et al 2002, Reeb et al 2004, Xi et al 2004, Murata et al 2005, Wang et al 2005, Wedin et al 2005, Kodsueb et al 2006, Réblová & Seifert 2007, Tsui et al 2007, Gueidan et al 2008, Boehm et al 2009, Sugiyama et al 2002, Boonmee et al 2011, Pettersson et al 2011, Réblová et al 2011, Giraldo et al 2013). The selection of these sequences was based on the results of a BLAST search using the D1/D2 and ITS sequences from each of the ex-type strains of the different species of Arthrographis and Arthropsis .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%