2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315408001732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetics of Trachylina (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) with new insights on the evolution of some problematical taxa

Abstract: Some of the most interesting and enigmatic cnidarians are classified within the hydrozoan subclass Trachylina. Despite being relatively depauperate in species richness, the clade contains four taxa typically accorded ordinal status: Actinulida, Limnomedusae, Narcomedusae and Trachymedusae. We bring molecular data (mitochondrial 16S and nuclear small and large subunit ribosomal genes) to bear on the question of phylogenetic relationships within Trachylina. Surprisingly, we find that a diminutive polyp form, Mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
85
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cnidarians and Ctenophores, referred hereafter as Jellyfish, were later sorted from the samples, transferred into 5% formalin-seawater buffered with borax and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible under a dissecting microscope. Taxonomy followed Naumov (1960), Kramp (1968), Arai & BrinckmannVoss (1980), Pagès & Gili (1992), Bouillon (1999), Bouillon et al (2006), Collins et al (2008) and Lindsay et al (2008Lindsay et al ( , 2017 for Hydromedusae; Totton (1965aTotton ( , 1965b, Kirkpatrick & Pugh (1984), Pagès & Gili (1992), Pugh (1999Pugh ( , 2006, Bouillon et al (2006) and Mapstone (2009) for Siphonophorae; Mianzan & Cornelius (1999) and for Scyphomedusae; Mianzan (1999) and Mills & Haddock (2007) for Ctenophora.…”
Section: Fixation and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cnidarians and Ctenophores, referred hereafter as Jellyfish, were later sorted from the samples, transferred into 5% formalin-seawater buffered with borax and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible under a dissecting microscope. Taxonomy followed Naumov (1960), Kramp (1968), Arai & BrinckmannVoss (1980), Pagès & Gili (1992), Bouillon (1999), Bouillon et al (2006), Collins et al (2008) and Lindsay et al (2008Lindsay et al ( , 2017 for Hydromedusae; Totton (1965aTotton ( , 1965b, Kirkpatrick & Pugh (1984), Pagès & Gili (1992), Pugh (1999Pugh ( , 2006, Bouillon et al (2006) and Mapstone (2009) for Siphonophorae; Mianzan & Cornelius (1999) and for Scyphomedusae; Mianzan (1999) and Mills & Haddock (2007) for Ctenophora.…”
Section: Fixation and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Genomic DNA was extracted from the 99.5 % ethanolpreserved tissue of cultured specimens using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. 18S rDNA was PCR amplified and sequenced using primers and protocols outlined in Collins et al (2008). The new sequences were aligned using MEGA 6.06 with built in ClustalW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extractions were carried out on single individuals using the AutoGenPrep 965 high-throughput DNA extraction robotic system (AutoGen) following the manufacturer's instructions for Whole Blood extraction. PCR amplification of mitochondrial 16S and nuclear 18S was carried out according to the protocols established in Collins et al (2008), whereas COI was amplified and sequenced using the primers and protocol of Geller et al (2013). Barcoding at multiple loci was done in light of the concerns raised by Lindsay et al (2015) and because a lack of close relatives precluded identification of a "barcoding gap".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%