Phylogenetic risk assessment is robust for forecasting the impact ofEuropean insects onNorthAmerican conifers

Abstract

Some introduced species cause severe damage, although the majority have little impact. Robust predictions of which species are most likely to cause substantial impacts could focus efforts to mitigate those impacts or prevent certain invasions entirely. Introduced herbivorous insects can reduce crop yield, fundamentally alter natural and managed forest ecosystems, and are unique among invasive species in that they require certain host plants to succeed. Recent studies have demonstrated that understanding the evolutionary history of introduced herbivores and their host plants can provide robust predictions of impact. Specifically, divergence times between hosts in the native and introduced ranges of a nonnative insect can be used to predict the potential impact of the insect should it establish in a novel ecosystem. However, divergence time estimates vary among published phylogenetic datasets, making it crucial to understand if and how the choice of phylogeny affects prediction of impact. Here, we tested the robustness of impact prediction to variation in host phylogeny by using insects that feed on conifers and predicting the likelihood of high impact using four different published phylogenies. Our analyses ranked 62 insects that are not established in North America and 47 North American conifer species according to overall risk and vulnerability, respectively. We found that results were robust to the choice of phylogeny. Although published vascular plant phylogenies continue to be refined, our analysis indicates that those differences are not substantial enough to alter the predictions of invader impact. Our results can assist in focusing biosecurity programs for conifer pests and can be more generally applied to nonnative insects and their potential hosts by prioritizing surveillance for those insects most likely to be damaging invaders.

Recent Advances in Stimulus-Responsive Nanocarriers for Pesticide Delivery

“…So far, most research on pesticide-controlled release agents (CRFs) has predominantly focused on slow release rather than responding to environmental stimuli. − The growth of crops necessitates certain conditions, encompassing a suitable temperature and light, optimal soil pH, and sufficient moisture. Regrettably, these conditions also facilitate the proliferation of pathogens and weeds, damaging crop yield. − Designing and preparing precise drug release systems that respond to environmental changes and pathogen stimulation are crucial to addressing these issues and improving crop protection and yield. Such a targeted approach can be a rational solution to the problems mentioned earlier.…”

Approaches to Forecasting Damage by Invasive Forest Insects and Pathogens: A Cross-Assessment

“…An implicit assumption of models based on host phylogenetic relationships is that these phylogenies are well understood, although, in practice, many undergo continual revision. Alleviating this concern somewhat are recent results showing that some emergent predictions can be relatively robust to differing, recent plant phylogenetic models (Uden et al 2022).…”

Advances in understanding and predicting the spread of invading insect populations

“…Considering phenology during the transportation stage along trade routes also informs the probability of human-mediated long-distance movement [43]. Among herbivorous insects, it is crucial to consider interactions between the insect and its host plant in terms of phylogeny [44] and habitat connectivity [45]. Some models account for multiple interactions, such as the interactions among the invading insect, its host plant, fire, and drought [46] or the interplay between insects and fungal pathogens [47].…”