Phylogenetic relationships of the lower Caenogastropoda (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architaenioglossa, Campaniloidea, Cerithioidea) as determined by partial 18s rDNA sequences

Harasewych, M. G.; Adamkewicz, S. L.; Plassmeyer, Matthew; Gillevet, Patrick M.

doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1998.tb00467.x

Cited by 42 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relationships we can test are largely in agreement with prior morphological [10,[55][56][57] and molecular [58][59][60] analyses. We find a sister group relationship of Ampullarioidea (represented by Pomacea) to Sorbeoconcha, which comprise the remaining sampled caenogastropods (figure 3a).…”

Section: (B) Relationships Within Major Gastropod Cladessupporting

confidence: 70%

Phylogenomic analyses of deep gastropod relationships reject Orthogastropoda

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gastropods are a highly diverse clade of molluscs that includes many familiar animals, such as limpets, snails, slugs and sea slugs. It is one of the most abundant groups of animals in the sea and the only molluscan lineage that has successfully colonized land. Yet the relationships among and within its constituent clades have remained in flux for over a century of morphological, anatomical and molecular study. Here, we re-evaluate gastropod phylogenetic relationships by collecting new transcriptome data for 40 species and analysing them in combination with publicly available genomes and transcriptomes. Our datasets include all five main gastropod clades: Patellogastropoda, Vetigastropoda, Neritimorpha, Caenogastropoda and Heterobranchia. We use two different methods to assign orthology, subsample each of these matrices into three increasingly dense subsets, and analyse all six of these supermatrices with two different models of molecular evolution. All 12 analyses yield the same unrooted network connecting the five major gastropod lineages. This reduces deep gastropod phylogeny to three alternative rooting hypotheses. These results reject the prevalent hypothesis of gastropod phylogeny, Orthogastropoda. Our dated tree is congruent with a possible end-Permian recovery of some gastropod clades, namely Caenogastropoda and some Heterobranchia subclades.

show abstract

Section: (B) Relationships Within Major Gastropod Cladessupporting

confidence: 70%

Phylogenomic analyses of deep gastropod relationships reject Orthogastropoda

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The placement of Campanile outside the Cerithioidea as currently construed is supported by sperm and osphradial ultrastructure data (Healy, 1986;Haszprunar, 1992) and partial 18S nuclear cytoplasmic sequence data (Harasewych et al, 1998). Although one interpretation of the cladogram would be to unite the three superfamilies (Cerithioidea (Vermetoidea ϩ Campaniloidea)) into a single larger superfamily, we believe such a recommendation would be premature and unwarranted without denser taxonomic sampling among all caenogastropods and particularly Sorbeoconcha.…”

Section: Phylogenetic Placement Of Vermetidae and Campanilementioning

confidence: 95%

“…Based on subsequent anatomical studies including sperm (Healy, 1986) and osphradial ultrastructure (Haszprunar, 1988), it was recognized as a separate family (Campanilidae) within the Cerithioidea (Houbrick, 1988;Healy, 1986Healy, , 1988aPonder and Warén, 1988), its own superfamily outside the Caenogastropoda (Haszprunar, 1988), and its own superfamily within the Caenogastropoda, but outside Cerithioidea (Houbrick, 1989;Haszprunar, 1992). Morphology-based (Ponder and Lindberg, 1997) and molecular studies (Harasewych et al, 1998;Colgan et al, 2000) support the placement within Caenogastropoda; however, taxonomic sampling in these studies was limited to one or a few cerithioideans.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Members of the superfamily are particularly diverse in the tropics and subtropics and occupy a variety of marine, estuarine, and freshwater habitats including mangrove forests (potamidids), estuarine mudflats (batillariids), seagrass beds (modulids, cerithiids), rocky intertidal shores (cerithiids, planaxids), algal fronds (litiopids), fast-flowing streams and rivers (pleurocerids, melanopsids, thiarids), and quiet lakes (pleurocerids, thiarids) (Houbrick, 1988;Healy and Wells, 1998). Cerithioideans are presumed to be monophyletic, representative basal members of the major gastropod clade Caenogastropoda and to play a fundamental role in evaluating higher-order phylogenetic studies of gastropods (Haszprunar, 1988;Ponder and Lindberg, 1997;Harasewych et al, 1998;Colgan et al, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Molecular Phylogeny of a Circum-Global, Diverse Gastropod Superfamily (Cerithioidea: Mollusca: Caenogastropoda): Pushing the Deepest Phylogenetic Limits of Mitochondrial LSU rDNA Sequences

Lydeard

Holznagel

Glaubrecht

et al. 2002

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…About 1 to 2% of living flowering plants are aquatic, representing 50 to 100 independent invasions of fresh water (Cook, 1996); whereas only 60 species in three clades have become fully marine. Living freshwater molluscs belong to 15 gastropod and 14 bivalve clades, all of marine origin (compiled from Vermeij & Dudley, 1985;Gray, 1988;Houbrick, 1988;Ponder, 1988;Harasewych et al, 1998). Among fossil molluscs, an additional five clades of gastropods and three of bivalves contain freshwater representatives (compiled from Gray, 1988).…”

Section: Fresh Water As Intermediate and Recipient Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why are there so few evolutionary transitions between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems?

Vermeij

Dudley

2000

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insects and flowering plants have rarely invaded the sea. Explanations for this have traditionally centered on the unique shortcomings of these groups in the marine environment. We show, however, that transitions among terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments are infrequent in all major plant and animal clades except tetrapod vertebrates. In general, well-adapted incumbents are at a competitive advantage over would-be invaders from a physically different habitat. Data on the times and places of transition are consistent with our contention that evolutionary transitions among physically different environments are most likely when incumbents in the recipient environment exist in a regime of low-intensity competition and predation, as in terrestrial communities of the middle Paleozoic or the land biotas of oceanic islands. Freshwater environments, in which inferred intensities of predation are lower than in most marine and terrestrial environments, offer less biotic resistance to invaders than do communities in the sea or on land. Most invaders respond to novel physical circumstances by shutting down their metabolic machinery, and therefore add to their subordinate status as competitors with active incumbents. Only active tetrapods, particularly those with high and endothermically driven rates of metabolism, have successfully overcome this limitation.

show abstract

Phylogenetic relationships of the lower Caenogastropoda (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architaenioglossa, Campaniloidea, Cerithioidea) as determined by partial 18s rDNA sequences

Cited by 42 publications

References 17 publications

Phylogenomic analyses of deep gastropod relationships reject Orthogastropoda

Phylogenomic analyses of deep gastropod relationships reject Orthogastropoda

Molecular Phylogeny of a Circum-Global, Diverse Gastropod Superfamily (Cerithioidea: Mollusca: Caenogastropoda): Pushing the Deepest Phylogenetic Limits of Mitochondrial LSU rDNA Sequences

Why are there so few evolutionary transitions between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About