2020
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.162.53361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships and status of taxa of Pulsatilla uralensis and P. patens s.str. (Ranunculaceae) in north-eastern European Russia

Abstract: We studied the allopatric complex Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. s.lat. (Ranunculaceae) in north-eastern European Russia and the Urals. In this region, there are two kinds of P. patens with different perianth colours in monochrome and polychrome populations. To clarify their taxonomic boundaries, we used the sequences of chloroplast DNA (rbcL and matK) and nuclear DNA (ITS2), in addition to morphological characteristics. The combination of three markers (rbcL+matK+ITS2) was found to be the most effective for phy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA markers are an effective method for analyzing phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary processes and the most commonly used DNA markers include ITS, matK, rpoB, rbcL, psbA-trnH, and others (Adolfo et al 2022; Kurian et al 2020;Li et al 2022). As single DNA markers cannot distinguish genetic differences in closely related species, combined sequences (such as ITS + trnL-trnF (Feng et al 2019), rbcL + matK + ITS2 (Valuyskikh et al 2020) have been extensively used. However, few studies have used DNA markers in the phylogenetic analysis of L. japonicus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA markers are an effective method for analyzing phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary processes and the most commonly used DNA markers include ITS, matK, rpoB, rbcL, psbA-trnH, and others (Adolfo et al 2022; Kurian et al 2020;Li et al 2022). As single DNA markers cannot distinguish genetic differences in closely related species, combined sequences (such as ITS + trnL-trnF (Feng et al 2019), rbcL + matK + ITS2 (Valuyskikh et al 2020) have been extensively used. However, few studies have used DNA markers in the phylogenetic analysis of L. japonicus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%