2000
DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-39-1-19.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Haptophyta inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences and available morphological data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
138
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
138
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly true for taxa for which classification was previously controversial due to the lack of clear morphological criteria. Successful integration of morphological and molecular taxonomy has been demonstrated for many groups of marine flagellates, for example, for cryptomonads (Hoef-Emden & Melkonian, 2003;Cerino & Zingone, 2006, 2007 and prymnesiophytes (Edvardsen et al, 2000;Medlin & Zingone, 2007;Edvardsen et al, 2011). Nevertheless, attempts to achieve such a synthesis with raphidophytes have thus far been more problematic, mainly because of the lack of correspondence between morphological and molecular classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true for taxa for which classification was previously controversial due to the lack of clear morphological criteria. Successful integration of morphological and molecular taxonomy has been demonstrated for many groups of marine flagellates, for example, for cryptomonads (Hoef-Emden & Melkonian, 2003;Cerino & Zingone, 2006, 2007 and prymnesiophytes (Edvardsen et al, 2000;Medlin & Zingone, 2007;Edvardsen et al, 2011). Nevertheless, attempts to achieve such a synthesis with raphidophytes have thus far been more problematic, mainly because of the lack of correspondence between morphological and molecular classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences of haptophyte taxa basal to Prymnesiales in previous phylogenetic studies (e.g. Edvardsen et al, 2000;Medlin et al, 2008) were selected as outgroups to root the trees. Four datasets were generated: 18S (63 taxa, 1838 characters), 28S (37 taxa, 1086 characters), 16S (22 taxa, 701 characters) and a concatenated dataset of the three genes, including taxa where both 18S and 28S rDNA sequences were available (30 taxa, 3625 characters), with the 16S rDNA for 13 taxa (Table 1).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our 18S rDNA tree (Fig. 3), clades are numbered according to our previous work (Edvardsen et al, 2000) and newly recognized clades B1-1 to B1-6. The first divergence within the class Prymnesiophyceae (the ingroup) corresponds to the order Phaeocystales, clade A (see Lange et al, 2002 morphology of these cells is known.…”
Section: Molecular Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both these higher group probes signal intensities were positively correlated except for PrymS02_25_dT normalised to DunGS02_25_dT_dT, which produced a negative linear regression (Table III- Table III-S3) for Prymnesiophyceae normalised signal intensity with both control probes had a positive linear relationship R 2 ≥ 0.84; but, only the normalised POSITIVE_25_dT curve was significant (P = 0.0276). Both the clade level probes (Clade01old_25_dT (Prymnesium) and Clade01new25_dT (Prymnesium B1 clade sensu Edvardsen et al, 2000) normalised signal intensities were positively correlated R 2 ≥ 0.73 and significant (P ≤ 0.0477) except for Clade01new25_dT normalised to DunGS02_25_dT_dT (Table III-2). Two species-specific probes for P. parvum were redesigned for the third generation chip from original sequences in the 28S (PparvD01_25_dT; and 18S regions (Prymparv01_25_dT; (Table III-S3).…”
Section: Prymnesium Parvummentioning
confidence: 94%