2002
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic reconstruction of parental–care systems in the ancestors of birds

Abstract: Due to the controversy surrounding incipient avian parental care, ancestral parental care systems were reconstructed in a phylogeny including major extant amniote lineages. Using two different resolutions for the basal avian branches, transitions between the states no care, female care, biparental care and male care were inferred for the most basal branches of the tree. Uniparental female care was inferred for the lineage to birds and crocodiles. Using a phylogeny where ratites and tinamous branch off early an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, males contribute to parental care in fewer than 5% of mammalian species and even more rarely among extant non-avian reptiles (1). The origin of this paternal contribution as well as the overall parental care system in ancestral birds remains controversial (2,3). Maternal care predominates in crocodilians (the closest living sister taxon to birds), and the two major clades of extant birds use differing parental care systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, males contribute to parental care in fewer than 5% of mammalian species and even more rarely among extant non-avian reptiles (1). The origin of this paternal contribution as well as the overall parental care system in ancestral birds remains controversial (2,3). Maternal care predominates in crocodilians (the closest living sister taxon to birds), and the two major clades of extant birds use differing parental care systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest attendance in Massospondylus, and all nonavian dinosaurs, may also be inferred from phylogenetic bracketing, as most extant archosaurs attend their nests (31,32). However, Massospondylus provides important reproductive data for sauropodomorphs before the evolution of gigantism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Rhign 1984;Elzanowski 1985;Van Rhign 1990;Wesolowski 1994;Ligon 1999;Vehrencamp 2000;Wesolowski 2004) or maternal (e.g. Burley and Johnson 2002;Tullberg et al 2002). This section investigates these hypotheses and evaluates what relevance each has in consideration to ichnological evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McKitrick (1992) constructed a phylogenetic analysis of 60 extant avian taxa using both parental care behaviour (15 characters) in tandem with anatomical data (69 characters), which inferred biparental care as ancestral for birds and that biparental incubation Historical Biology 189 has its origins in an ancestral condition in which neither sex incubated. In a more recent analysis, Tullberg et al (2002) attempted to reconstruct ancestral parental care systems in a phylogeny that included all the primary extant amniote lineages. Transitions between the character states of no parental care, female-only care, biparental care and male-only care were inferred using two distinct resolutions for the most basal avian branches of the phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Hypothesis One: Biparental Care As Ancestralmentioning
confidence: 99%