2002
DOI: 10.1007/s006060200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic position of the Sphaeropleaceae (Chlorophyta)

Abstract: The complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of four Sphaeroplea C.A. Agardh strains (Sphaeropleales, Sphaeropleaceae), two Atractomorpha Homan strains (Sphaeropleales, Sphaeropleaceae) and two Ankyra Fott strains (Chlorococcales, Characiaceae) were determined and subjected to phylogenetic analyses. The analyses indicated that all these taxa belong to a monophyletic lineage (Sphaeropleaceae) and are related to a group of chlorophycean algae comprising autosporic taxa and taxa that reproduce by zoospores which are char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional orders and genera were found to be polyphyletic while others were moved to other classes (e.g., Chlorellales) (see Lewis & McCourt, 2004 for a taxonomic history). Molecular and ultrastructural data have identified five major clades (Booton et al, 1998a;Wolf et al, 2002;Wolf et al, 2003;Turmel et al, 2008). The Chlamydomonadales is characterized by a CW flagellar apparatus orientation in biflagellate members, but quadriflagellate representatives may display various other orientations (Nakayama et al, 1996a;Nozaki et al, 2003;Watanabe et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Chlorophyceaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional orders and genera were found to be polyphyletic while others were moved to other classes (e.g., Chlorellales) (see Lewis & McCourt, 2004 for a taxonomic history). Molecular and ultrastructural data have identified five major clades (Booton et al, 1998a;Wolf et al, 2002;Wolf et al, 2003;Turmel et al, 2008). The Chlamydomonadales is characterized by a CW flagellar apparatus orientation in biflagellate members, but quadriflagellate representatives may display various other orientations (Nakayama et al, 1996a;Nozaki et al, 2003;Watanabe et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Chlorophyceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sphaeropleales form another large group of Chlorophyceae, including some of the most common freshwater phytoplankters such as Scenedesmus, Desmodesmus and Pediastrum, as well as picoplanktonic members (Wolf et al, 2002;Krienitz et al, 2011). Representatives are non-motile unicells, colonies or filaments, which produce biflagellate zoospores (zoosporic) or non-motile spores (autosporic).…”
Section: Chlorophyceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not intended as a synonym for the quadriciliate condition (Cavalier-Smith, 1992, p. 93), which has arisen more than once, notably also within green algae, being the predominant kinetid pattern in the subphylum Chlorophytina (Cavalier-Smith, 1998;Wolfe et al, 2002), but, as they have four similarly beating anterior cilia, kinetid organization is completely different, especially in prasinophytes where all centrioles are typically parallel, and they are quadriciliate but not tetrakont. The arrangement of three anterior (or one anterior and two anterolateral) and one posterior centriole characteristic of Metamonada has been remarked on for decades (Grassé, 1952;Farmer, 1993) and constitutes a shared derived character that defines the group.…”
Section: Tetrakontymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five orders are recognized within the class (Oedogoniales, Chaetophorales, Chaetopeltidales, Volvocales and Sphaeropleales), and the relationships among them are fairly well understood (Booton et al, 1998;Buchheim et al, 2001;Wolf et al, 2002;Turmel et al, 2008;Tippery et al, 2012). By contrast, higher classification within Ulvophyceae and especially Trebouxiophyceae is still unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%