2002
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.48.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic position of Mixia osmundae inferred from 28S rDNA comparison.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to its sac-like appearance, the sporogenous cell was originally interpreted as an ascus and therefore M. osmundae was first described in the Ascomycota as Taphrina osmundae Nishida (Nishida, 1911). More than 80 yr later, detailed morphological and molecular studies showed that M. osmundae holds a rather isolated position within the Basidiomycota, with the simple-septate species now placed together within Pucciniomycotina Sugiyama, 1998;Sjamsuridzal et al, 2002;Aime et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its sac-like appearance, the sporogenous cell was originally interpreted as an ascus and therefore M. osmundae was first described in the Ascomycota as Taphrina osmundae Nishida (Nishida, 1911). More than 80 yr later, detailed morphological and molecular studies showed that M. osmundae holds a rather isolated position within the Basidiomycota, with the simple-septate species now placed together within Pucciniomycotina Sugiyama, 1998;Sjamsuridzal et al, 2002;Aime et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 NISHIDA, NAGATSUKA, and SUGIYAMA Basidiomycota (Bauer et al, 2006;Nishida et al, 1995;Sjamsuridzal et al, 2002). The phylogenetic position of Mixia osmundae within the Pucciniomycotina (Basidiomycota) and the identity of its sporangium remain unresolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%